I know
the fact that he mentioned 2 names Shane lost to had to mean he was just talking about comp faced not necessarily comp defeated
fighters don't get props for lost fights
its not worth your time either, what am i going around and around with this moron burner. it's just so easy to make him look ******, it's almost addictive
It is better that one loses to big names to show your worth than to have an "undefeated record" without fighting anyone worthy of big names.
That is the logic behind it and please don't take it literally. Of course, Mayweather had some great fights but relatively lesser than Mosley's resumes.
its not worth your time either, what am i going around and around with this moron burner. it's just so easy to make him look ******, it's almost addictive
Stop back tracking.
Why do you think Shane has a better resume then Floyd Mayweather?
Hey walt how about you come debate me live about this.. if you feel so strong ly about it.
horus, i would do so any tme, but i'm not going out of my way, to be wherever whenever. it doesn't matter that much to me. i just hapen to have some free time. pm me details
Can't you put both fighters comp since 2003 in fonts or something.
Utlilize the fonts brotha.
Like Mayweather red, Mosley black.
I'm too fucking lazy for that
it takes 1 extra second to add size + color to posts I'm not looking **** up
I actually wanted to discuss this topic, not joke about it but poor Milton makes everything hard on himself
gago
horus, i would do so any tme, but i'm not going out of my way, to be wherever whenever. it doesn't matter that much to me. i just hapen to have some free time. pm me details
Alright Ill give you a chance to change your story. Why do you think Shane has a better resume then Floyd Mayweather?
see post # 43 for definition of resume. are you even reading this thread???
and you really should try an educate yourself just a little bit.
Man naw dont try to come in here and make up some bull**** criteria. You said and I quoted you that Shane has a better resume then Floyd because he fought Vernon and Winky.
Did you say that?
Originally posted by Walt Liquor
you said shane has no chance burner, you're an idiot.
you are worthless saynig that floyd's resume is better tahn shane's i no longer respect your opinion at all, not ever one little but, you are a child.
Just Winky and Vernon (33-0, 34-0 rematch) absolutely crush floyd's resume. *** off burner and stop riding another man's *** so bad
Alright Ill give you a chance to change your story. Why do you think Shane has a better resume then Floyd Mayweather?
i aint changing shi t, those two guys are tougher fights than anything floyd ever faced. shane has just as many good wins as floyd and has been elite just as long or longer, therefor shane's resume>floyd's.
i aint changing shi t, those two guys are tougher fights than anything floyd ever faced. shane has just as many good wins as floyd and has been elite just as long or longer, therefor shane's resume>floyd's.
floyd has a better record than shane.
So by your logic Andy Koelle has a better resume then Amir Khan. I mean Koelle did fight Paul Williams and Andre Ward.
Tweet
Comment