The Only Top P4P Guy Pac Faced Whipped His Azz

[Sweet Jesus]

Even i was a floyd fan i couldn't finish watching floyd fights because every time i watch his fights i ended up sleeping on my chair. But thanks to floyd it helps me cure my insomnia.

Do you have any talents?

[shadeyfizzle]

According to TS's logic...Delahoya and Castillo also whooped Mayweather's azz and got robbed in close fights.

[Sweet Jesus]

Oh HAI guys, did you know that Wladimir Klitschko vs. Sam Peter was the biggest robbery of all time? I mean, Klitschko visited the canvas three times that night, and they called him a winner? Let's take notes people, because

What does one have to do with the other? This is dumber than some ******* posts.

[S A M U R A I]

close fights is followed by a comma, u conveniently left that and the rest of the sentence out. Less funny that way?

Good lord. Get a grip.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[mangler jr]

JMM was badly screwed in both fights.

How you can make ping ping look like a total amateur 2x and still lose is beyond me.

Oh well.

Most people know whats up.

[pasawayako]

Do you have any talents?

[pasawayako]

JMM was badly screwed in both fights.

How you can make ping ping look like a total amateur 2x and still lose is beyond me.

Oh well.

Most people know whats up.

an amateur who makes floyd run for the 40million dollars payday.

[Khalid X]

Seriously, its true, Marquez is the only top P4P guy that Pac actually fought. And Marquez whipped his azz twice. Close fights, Pac had his moments, but Marquez had more moments though he didn't get the wins. MAB,EM, those guys are rated highly but they were never imo, top P4P. Some of you may disagree with that but thats my opinion.

As long as Pac has been a commodity in the sport Floyd and Hopkins have sat on top of that P4P list. Pac only got there when Floyd retired and off the strength of his close call with Marquez and a truly shot ODLH.

Now I'm not about to put down any Pac opponents they fought him and got beat. But to be P4P #1, shouldn't you have to fight and beat guys at the top of that list convincingly? (at least when they are near and within your weight class) I dont have a current top 10 P4P list at hand, but I bet none of the guys Pac has fought the past 2-3 years but Marquez, is on it.

Another question: If Mayweather comes back from retirement and beats P4P #2 amd #3, doesn't that automatically makes him #1? If not, then justify why Pac is #1?

Barrera was consider of the best fighter in boxing and while Im not sure if he was #1 I know he was top 3 p4p boxers. Pac was a 10-1 underdog and no one gave him a chance. Pac proceeded to beat the living **** outta Barrera.
That is one of the most dominating performance over another top p4p fighter I have ever seen and I'm just lucky the fight happened in my hometown. It was at that moment I became a Pac fan.

[Khalid X]

JMM was badly screwed in both fights.

How you can make ping ping look like a total amateur 2x and still lose is beyond me.

Oh well.

Most people know whats up.

amatuer? Do you watch fights or do you watch Highlight? Anyone who watch the second fight will tell you its close whether there the most biased Marquez fan or the most biased Pac fan.


FWIW I have scored that fight 3 different ways.
1. I try to be biased toward Marquez by automatically given any close round to him and scored it a draw

2. I scored it from a neutral stance and had it 115-113 in favor of Pac

3. Then I scored it by given the close rounds to Pac and had it 116-111

I mean I don't see how anyone can sit here and tell me Marquez won the second fight let alone make Pac look amateurish. Truth is Marquez was finishing off combos better, had two huge counters in the fight but it was Pac putting in more work throughout the rounds.

[Fox McCloud]

What does one have to do with the other? This is dumber than some ******* posts.

I can't imagine what you are on about... I was merely pointing out the absurdity of hugh grant's post saying that you can't truly be a winner if you visit the canvas, saying that Marquez should be 0-2 against Pacquiao for that fact alone, which makes 0 sense.