The Only Top P4P Guy Pac Faced Whipped His Azz
Collapse
-
-
Was Morales still P4P ranked after the Raheem fiasco? I would have a hard time keeping him on the list after being decisively shut out.Comment
-
He sure was. #6 p4p according to ring magazine;
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th...r_Pound--2000sComment
-
Jesus... that's absurd. I would have never guessed.He sure was. #6 p4p according to ring magazine;
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th...r_Pound--2000s
It's hard to think of a fight where a top fighter was more embarrassed and shut down for 12 rounds.
Maybe Forrest-Mosley I, but not too many make the list.Comment
-
Comment
-
its not a maybe, he was top 10 p4p when pac beat him.
morales was entrenched in the top 10 p4p rankings & only lost to MAB a fellow p4p fighter, when he beat pacquiao. Beating pacquiao, a budding great fighter at that time kept him in the top 10 p4p. the raheem lost did not drop him from the top because it was attributed to morales testing 135 & basically a tune up fight for pac vs em2. This is why i dont get people saying pac ducked raheem. pac vs velasquez took place on the same card as morales vs raheem in la. Raheem was nowhere near morales in standing, stature, or money. Add the fact that morales beat pac, the rematch had to happen even though em lost to raheem.Comment
-
Yes...I was disgusted by the way Raheem got crapped on. He beat the **** out of Morales and then Pacquiao pretended it never happened. Even worse, they actually convinced people to watching a THIRD match! Good Lord.Comment
-
Yeah, Pacquiao ducking Raheem makes 0 sense to me. Pacquiao hadn't fought at 135 and wouldn't go up there until 2008. Raheem had already fallen off by that point.its not a maybe, he was top 10 p4p when pac beat him.
morales was entrenched in the top 10 p4p rankings & only lost to MAB a fellow p4p fighter, when he beat pacquiao. Beating pacquiao, a budding great fighter at that time kept him in the top 10 p4p. the raheem lost did not drop him from the top because it was attributed to morales testing 135 & basically a tune up fight for pac vs em2. This is why i dont get people saying pac ducked raheem. pac vs velasquez took place on the same card as morales vs raheem in la. Raheem was nowhere near morales in standing, stature, or money. Add the fact that morales beat pac, the rematch had to happen even though em lost to raheem.Comment
-
At the time there are very few who believed Pac could beat Raheem, but everybody knew after that performance that he could beat Morales. Pac vs Morales 2 and 3 was a disgrace. Pac vs Barrera 2 was a disgrace. I say that in light that so many of you call May-Marquez a disgrace. I can keep going, Pac-Diaz was a disgrace.its not a maybe, he was top 10 p4p when pac beat him.
morales was entrenched in the top 10 p4p rankings & only lost to MAB a fellow p4p fighter, when he beat pacquiao. Beating pacquiao, a budding great fighter at that time kept him in the top 10 p4p. the raheem lost did not drop him from the top because it was attributed to morales testing 135 & basically a tune up fight for pac vs em2. This is why i dont get people saying pac ducked raheem. pac vs velasquez took place on the same card as morales vs raheem in la. Raheem was nowhere near morales in standing, stature, or money. Add the fact that morales beat pac, the rematch had to happen even though em lost to raheem.Comment
Comment