(Analogy)If I was pulled over in my car at a checkpoint.....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hahaa
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 180
    • 2
    • 2
    • 6,248

    #31
    Originally posted by Cyborg
    I got pulled over in my car on my way to making some good money, simply at a checkpoint.

    When I asked the police why he pulled me over he points at the corner and says some guy said I was driving recklessly. BUT I WASNT!
    Now the police tell me they believe I was drinking. But I WASNT!
    Now the police told me to take a breathalizer.
    Would it be rational or even justified? If I refuse and say:

    1.That guy on the corner has no right to say I was driving reckless. So I refuse to take the breathalizer test!

    2. I have never been pulled over before so why should I take your test now. I refuse!

    3.Officer, I refuse to take test because I fear breathalizers!

    4.I have alot of money so I refuse to take test. Take me to jail and my lawyer will get me out(a bit inconvenient but no test)

    5.Give me a certain amount of time befoe the test or I refuse!

    6. Dont take the breathalizer and tell the Officer, I have my pride and technically he nor does the guy on the corner makes up the law!

    7. Just take the test and be on my way and get that money.

    Simple Analogy ..whats the right thing to do?

    Without knowledge of a failed may-pac(anology) failed negotiations and base on my character, I would definitely refuse the test to some extent. I am a leo and are famous for pride (false) but w/e..

    Anyways, to some extent because I know for a fact that he has the right to look into the claims. heck, there are always signs on the freeway to report a possible drunk driver.

    After 1, and get owned I do 7

    Comment

    • Alibata
      Dugong Maharlika
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2004
      • 9047
      • 280
      • 33
      • 16,053

      #32
      Originally posted by myooosic
      If floyd wasnt gay... why doesnt he just let ellerbe **** him in the ass to show the world that he doesnt enjoy it...?
      He beat you there hammerheim. Best analogy of the thread hands down

      Comment

      • 407BoriKua
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 974
        • 77
        • 29
        • 1,972

        #33
        pacroid should have taken the test if he really wanted the fight that bad and if he knows that hes clean it would have shut up everyone accusing him and may 2. He didn't take it because he not clean.

        Comment

        • hahaa
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 180
          • 2
          • 2
          • 6,248

          #34
          Originally posted by hammerhiem
          Better anology



          We both know you would tell the other guy to fcuk the hell off.

          Quit acting like Floyd Mayweather has any authority in boxing.
          QFT

          closest thing to a analogy

          Comment

          • hammerhiem
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 4877
            • 129
            • 102
            • 11,163

            #35
            Originally posted by Alibata
            He beat you there hammerheim. Best analogy of the thread hands down
            You could be right.

            Comment

            • Sin City
              la mala vida
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2006
              • 27551
              • 1,757
              • 2,208
              • 47,596

              #36
              Originally posted by Horus
              If take the pacquiao stance, and dont take the test.
              you will get your CAR IMPOUNDED,
              License probably suspended,
              and probably taken into custody for resisting to cooperate with authorities.

              Every reason pacquiao gave for not taking the test failed the Logic test
              different situations.. the pacquiao one doesn't apply.
              police wouldn't administer a breathalizer test without actual proof of su****ion.
              you would have to be acting drunk or unable to drive.

              Pacquiao has never done anything to merit belief in him using steroids.
              this thread fails horribly.

              Comment

              • DonTaseMeBrah
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 5828
                • 683
                • 575
                • 6,409

                #37
                Originally posted by Cyborg
                I got pulled over in my car on my way to making some good money, simply at a checkpoint.

                When I asked the police why he pulled me over he points at the corner and says some guy said I was driving recklessly. BUT I WASNT!
                Now the police tell me they believe I was drinking. But I WASNT!
                Now the police told me to take a breathalizer.
                Would it be rational or even justified? If I refuse and say:

                1.That guy on the corner has no right to say I was driving reckless. So I refuse to take the breathalizer test!

                2. I have never been pulled over before so why should I take your test now. I refuse!

                3.Officer, I refuse to take test because I fear breathalizers!

                4.I have alot of money so I refuse to take test. Take me to jail and my lawyer will get me out(a bit inconvenient but no test)

                5.Give me a certain amount of time befoe the test or I refuse!

                6. Dont take the breathalizer and tell the Officer, I have my pride and technically he nor does the guy on the corner makes up the law!

                7. Just take the test and be on my way and get that money.

                Simple Analogy ..whats the right thing to do?
                this;

                Originally posted by DonTaseMeBrah
                Lets say for example you live in America & a person accuses you of stealing their shoes. The cops come & say we want to search your house, do you agree?

                You agree to the search, the cops come & search the house & they find nothing. But your accuser is paranoid, wrong, & not satisfied. He says NO THAT SEARCH IS NOT RIGHT......


                THE ACCUSER WANTS TO ASK THE CHINESE COMMUNIST POLICE TO CONDUCT THE SEARCH USING THEIR LAWS & DISREGARD THE AMERICAN LAWS THAT IS IN PLACE.

                Is this right?
                Talk about anything boxing related here. Where the boxing discussion is always Non Stop!

                Comment

                • Cyborg
                  Banned
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 281
                  • 21
                  • 0
                  • 416

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Sin City
                  different situations.. the pacquiao one doesn't apply.
                  police wouldn't administer a breathalizer test without actual proof of su****ion.
                  you would have to be acting drunk or unable to drive.

                  Pacquiao has never done anything to merit belief in him using steroids.
                  this thread fails horribly.
                  ITS A CHECKPOINT...lol

                  Comment

                  • Alibata
                    Dugong Maharlika
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2004
                    • 9047
                    • 280
                    • 33
                    • 16,053

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Cyborg
                    ITS A CHECKPOINT...lol
                    Pacquiao did not comply what would happen in your fantasy world? Because in the real one he is fighting Clottey. come on man humor us.

                    Comment

                    • Dirt McGirt
                      Waddaboutchee
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 158
                      • 7
                      • 6
                      • 6,192

                      #40
                      Mayweather isnt the law. In this case he would be another driver on the same street.

                      Put it this way, if another driver stopped you and accused you of drink driving based on what a crackhead on the street corner said, would you take a breath test? or tell him to go f**k himself?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP