(Analogy)If I was pulled over in my car at a checkpoint.....

[hahaa]

I got pulled over in my car on my way to making some good money, simply at a checkpoint.

When I asked the police why he pulled me over he points at the corner and says some guy said I was driving recklessly. BUT I WASNT!
Now the police tell me they believe I was drinking. But I WASNT!
Now the police told me to take a breathalizer.
Would it be rational or even justified? If I refuse and say:

1.That guy on the corner has no right to say I was driving reckless. So I refuse to take the breathalizer test!

2. I have never been pulled over before so why should I take your test now. I refuse!

3.Officer, I refuse to take test because I fear breathalizers!

4.I have alot of money so I refuse to take test. Take me to jail and my lawyer will get me out(a bit inconvenient but no test)

5.Give me a certain amount of time befoe the test or I refuse!

6. Dont take the breathalizer and tell the Officer, I have my pride and technically he nor does the guy on the corner makes up the law!

7. Just take the test and be on my way and get that money.

Simple Analogy ..whats the right thing to do?

Without knowledge of a failed may-pac(anology) failed negotiations and base on my character, I would definitely refuse the test to some extent. I am a leo and are famous for pride (false) but w/e..

Anyways, to some extent because I know for a fact that he has the right to look into the claims. heck, there are always signs on the freeway to report a possible drunk driver.

After 1, and get owned I do 7

[Alibata]

If floyd wasnt gay... why doesnt he just let ellerbe **** him in the ass to show the world that he doesnt enjoy it...?

He beat you there hammerheim. Best analogy of the thread hands down

[407BoriKua]

pacroid should have taken the test if he really wanted the fight that bad and if he knows that hes clean it would have shut up everyone accusing him and may 2. He didn't take it because he not clean.

[hahaa]

Better anology



We both know you would tell the other guy to fcuk the hell off.

Quit acting like Floyd Mayweather has any authority in boxing.

QFT

closest thing to a analogy

[hammerhiem]

He beat you there hammerheim. Best analogy of the thread hands down

You could be right.

[Sin City]

If take the pacquiao stance, and dont take the test.
you will get your CAR IMPOUNDED,
License probably suspended,
and probably taken into custody for resisting to cooperate with authorities.

Every reason pacquiao gave for not taking the test failed the Logic test

different situations.. the pacquiao one doesn't apply.
police wouldn't administer a breathalizer test without actual proof of su****ion.
you would have to be acting drunk or unable to drive.

Pacquiao has never done anything to merit belief in him using steroids.
this thread fails horribly.

[DonTaseMeBrah]

I got pulled over in my car on my way to making some good money, simply at a checkpoint.

When I asked the police why he pulled me over he points at the corner and says some guy said I was driving recklessly. BUT I WASNT!
Now the police tell me they believe I was drinking. But I WASNT!
Now the police told me to take a breathalizer.
Would it be rational or even justified? If I refuse and say:

1.That guy on the corner has no right to say I was driving reckless. So I refuse to take the breathalizer test!

2. I have never been pulled over before so why should I take your test now. I refuse!

3.Officer, I refuse to take test because I fear breathalizers!

4.I have alot of money so I refuse to take test. Take me to jail and my lawyer will get me out(a bit inconvenient but no test)

5.Give me a certain amount of time befoe the test or I refuse!

6. Dont take the breathalizer and tell the Officer, I have my pride and technically he nor does the guy on the corner makes up the law!

7. Just take the test and be on my way and get that money.

Simple Analogy ..whats the right thing to do?

this;

Lets say for example you live in America & a person accuses you of stealing their shoes. The cops come & say we want to search your house, do you agree?

You agree to the search, the cops come & search the house & they find nothing. But your accuser is paranoid, wrong, & not satisfied. He says NO THAT SEARCH IS NOT RIGHT......


THE ACCUSER WANTS TO ASK THE CHINESE COMMUNIST POLICE TO CONDUCT THE SEARCH USING THEIR LAWS & DISREGARD THE AMERICAN LAWS THAT IS IN PLACE.

Is this right?

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=343064

[Cyborg]

different situations.. the pacquiao one doesn't apply.
police wouldn't administer a breathalizer test without actual proof of su****ion.
you would have to be acting drunk or unable to drive.

Pacquiao has never done anything to merit belief in him using steroids.
this thread fails horribly.

ITS A CHECKPOINT...lol

[Alibata]

ITS A CHECKPOINT...lol

Pacquiao did not comply what would happen in your fantasy world? Because in the real one he is fighting Clottey. come on man humor us.

[Dirt McGirt]

Mayweather isnt the law. In this case he would be another driver on the same street.

Put it this way, if another driver stopped you and accused you of drink driving based on what a crackhead on the street corner said, would you take a breath test? or tell him to go f**k himself?