If Mayweather beats Mosley, Mayweather is P4P KING again

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Reflexes-
    Motor City Cobra
    • Jan 2010
    • 2134
    • 64
    • 1
    • 8,528

    #91
    Originally posted by jrosales13
    What is the meaning of P4P? Like what is the definition?
    All things being equal (weight and size) who whoops any ones ass in the world.

    Comment

    • FloydTBE
      TBE
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 12561
      • 461
      • 204
      • 23,770

      #92
      Im going for maweather to win by UD. If anyone wants a 40k bet on the fight, PM me

      Comment

      • CarlosG815
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 3683
        • 240
        • 192
        • 10,304

        #93
        Umm, not exactly. Until he beats Pac he is not P4P king, as Pac is #1 p4p fighter in the world, he has to be beaten for Floyd to take that.

        Comment

        • pasawayako
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 15348
          • 639
          • 194
          • 151,963

          #94
          Originally posted by M.I.C.
          Floyd is already P4P #1, anyone says beating Mosley doesn't put him back at the #1 spot is a *******. Mayweather's skill set alone brings him back to the #1 spot.
          *****s trying desperately to make floyd the #1 lb4lb. Hahahaha
          Don't worry guys after pac retire as a #1 lb4lb and fighter of a decade floyd can become #1 again by default. Hahahahaha

          Comment

          • -Reflexes-
            Motor City Cobra
            • Jan 2010
            • 2134
            • 64
            • 1
            • 8,528

            #95
            Also Jro. Poonsawat and Calderon have to do SOMETHING that could catupult them ON THE LIST....let alone Number 1.

            The Rings Top 10:

            1. Pacman
            2. Mayweather
            3. Mosley
            4. Hopkins
            5. JMM
            6. Donaire
            7. Cotto
            8. Cabellero
            9. Dawson
            10. Williams






            There is a ranking system. Guys move up and down. Calderon and Poonsawat arent even ranked.

            Comment

            • The Noose
              AKA Bologna Panini
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Aug 2004
              • 12082
              • 1,040
              • 826
              • 44,455

              #96
              Originally posted by G. Larry Platt
              so based on your post, why is it many ppl on NSB have been calling for floyd to fight shane, when NOBODY gives shane a chance to win?

              also, against oscar, many ppl thought manny would lose because he was moving up in weight. they thought oscar was "bigger" so he'd win, while ignoring each fighter's boxing abilities. freddie roach, manny's trainer, who also trained oscar against floyd, said that oscar was old, and couldn't pull the trigger anymore, BEFORE he fought pacquiao.


              against cotto and hatton, pacquiao was the overwhelming betting favorite, so not too many ppl, besides fans of cotto and hatton, thought manny would lose.

              so my question is, why, before the fight got made, everybody discredited floyd, and said he was scared of shane....then after the fight gets made, it's dismissed, b/c nobody gives shane a chance at winning anyway? sounds a lil' illogical, don't you think?


              perhaps floyd should do like RA the rugged man said, and move up and fight chad dawson....seems to be the only way dude will get credit 'round these parts...

              People want Floyd to fight shane because Shane is the best of the WW's. Floyd has never fought a real WW before.

              The polls in NSB had Cotto-Pac at 50 - 50.

              I dont know what everyone else here thinks in terms of discrediting Floyd Shane.
              Im not discrediting the fight at all.

              All im saying is, Floyd beating Shane IMO wont move him to p4p no.1, because Shane isnt a threat.
              Cotto, Oscar and hatton were threats to Pac because they're all offensive, bigger fighters, plus he moved up in weight to fight each one.

              I dont see how one fight, Floyd - Smm, moves him up to no.1.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 738
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #97
                Originally posted by -Reflexes-
                All things being equal (weight and size) who whoops any ones ass in the world.
                Exactly that is why you can make a case for Poonsawat and Calderon... It has nothing to do with resume... P4P is a mythical, imaginary, opinion... there is no right or wrong answer... This might upset but by the true meaning of P4P I can probably make where P-Will do not deserve to be in the P4P top 10-20.... That is why my opinion this whole P4P **** is nonsense sometimes... Because, there is no title ,you don't lose that P4P status in the ring...

                For example if Floyd goes up to MW and fights Kelly Pavlik... And, gets KO'd by Pavlik... The Ring Magazine will drop Floyd a few spot in their P4P rankings... And, Pavlik might join the top 10... But, that makes no sense... By true definition of P4P... Floyd same size, same weight, same height, same reach as Pavlik beats him easily so why should he be punished...

                Pac losses to P-Will, Paul would be ranked ahead of Pac... But, by the true meaning it should not be liked that... That is why the Ring they can whoever they want is bull****... Because they don't go by the true definition...

                I can make a case for Floyd, Poonsawat, Calderon, Hasegawa, Pac, Dawson, for P4P king... Because, by true definition of P4P is what can you do inside the Ring... By true definition all this fighters have a case...

                Comment

                • -Reflexes-
                  Motor City Cobra
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 2134
                  • 64
                  • 1
                  • 8,528

                  #98
                  Originally posted by jrosales13
                  Exactly that is why you can make a case for Poonsawat and Calderon... It has nothing to do with resume... P4P is a mythical, imaginary, opinion... there is no right or wrong answer... This might upset but by the true meaning of P4P I can probably make where P-Will do not deserve to be in the P4P top 10-20.... That is why my opinion this whole P4P **** is nonsense sometimes... Because, there is no title ,you don't lose that P4P status in the ring...

                  For example if Floyd goes up to MW and fights Kelly Pavlik... And, gets KO'd by Pavlik... The Ring Magazine will drop Floyd a few spot in their P4P rankings... And, Pavlik might join the top 10... But, that makes no sense... By true definition of P4P... Floyd same size, same weight, same height, same reach as Pavlik beats him easily so why should he be punished...

                  Pac losses to P-Will, Paul would be ranked ahead of Pac... But, by the true meaning it should not be liked that... That is why the Ring they can whoever they want is bull****... Because they don't go by the true definition...

                  I can make a case for Floyd, Poonsawat, Calderon, Hasegawa, Pac, Dawson, for P4P king... Because, by true definition of P4P is what can you do inside the Ring... By true definition all this fighters have a case...
                  True definition got lost in translation years ago. P4P NOW in boxing means who is the best fighter in the world.

                  Counting resume, achievements and skills.

                  Thats like someone making a case for Rigondeaux being the P4P King because hes highly skilled. Its laughable.

                  To answer the thread: If Floyd dominates Mosley. The ring will make him Number 1 in the world and thats what we go by. Everytime someone asks me who is the best fighter in the world. I say Pacman. Do I think hes more skilled then Floyd? No. Do I think he beats Floyd? No. But he IS the P4P King.
                  Last edited by -Reflexes-; 01-30-2010, 04:57 PM.

                  Comment

                  • -Reflexes-
                    Motor City Cobra
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 2134
                    • 64
                    • 1
                    • 8,528

                    #99
                    And you do lose P4P status in the ring. If Pac loses to Clottey he will no longer be ranked Number 1 by the Ring. Floyd will.

                    Comment

                    • Vasyl’s dad
                      He said no rematch
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 23510
                      • 1,120
                      • 1,945
                      • 50,072

                      #100
                      Originally posted by Ekscape
                      I'll bet anyone right now... If Mayweather convincingly beats Mosley then Ring will rank him back at #1 p4p; because of the sense that he never lost the title in the first place; and then comes back and bets the #2 p4p and #3 p4p back to back... While Manny fought Cotto who was ranked #6 p4p at the time and Clottey who isnt ranked at all... He'll regain the title
                      Who is Ring owned by again?

                      Who represents Mayweather again?

                      Of course they're going to do everything in their power to slide him back to number 1.

                      They've got him ranked as a top 5 welterweight and he hasn't fought a welterweight in over 3 years.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP