Who's taken MORE risks? Mayweather or Calzaghe?

**niceguy45** · 01-26-2010, 04:13 PM

no contest, calzaghe with out a doubt

**jrosales13** · 01-26-2010, 04:13 PM

Really I am the only one who voted for Floyd?

Somebody tell me what risks that Calzaghe take?

**KRUEGER** · 01-26-2010, 04:13 PM

calzaghe has.........damn nice sig.....

**Check** · 01-26-2010, 04:13 PM

Simple answer, Mayweather. At the lower weights he took on the very best and beat the very best. Calzaghe didn't beat anyone that was in their prime that was legit other than maybe Kessler and we have seen how he ended up. It's kind of disrespectful to Floyd for anyone to really compare him to that guy.

**niceguy45** · 01-26-2010, 04:14 PM

Originally posted by J.Dempsey

Simple poll, who has?

nice model, damn....

**FloydTBE** · 01-26-2010, 04:14 PM

The only guys who calzaghe had taen risks against are kessler. Hopkins n Jones IMO werent risks, calzaghe was too fast and busy for them. Mayweather retired after the hattonfight when there was people saying maybe a fight with cotto loomed.

Im saying Mayweather.

**Xplosivo** · 01-26-2010, 04:14 PM

Originally posted by jrosales13

Really I am the only one who voted for Floyd?

Somebody tell me what risks that Calzaghe take?

fighting a 44 yr old hopkins is a risk according to his fans. apart from that all backyard fights in UK..against past prime fighters or punchbags/bums

**Check** · 01-26-2010, 04:15 PM

Too many idiots on these boards, ala Pac huggers. BPP needs to get busy on the bans!

**Savino** · 01-26-2010, 04:15 PM

Mayweather without question. DLH was a huge risk at LMW imo.

Who's taken MORE risks? Mayweather or Calzaghe?