Originally posted by LEFTYGUNZZ
View Post
Same thing when Pacquiao declined to Mayweather's whims and demands, he is not the Commission. Had NSAC demanded blood testing as a mandatory thing, it would be of no question that Pacquiao would oblige by it.
Both are in good standings according to the NSAC but an accusation and allegation to bait someone to blood testing isn't the best way, in fact it is the arrogant way.
Just like anyone "impeachment" to the President, does that mean the President would be subjected towards TRIAL IMPEACHMENT right away?
No, there should be a preliminary trial to see if there is a VALID GROUND or two that would determine its validity. And thus the lawsuit against the Mayweathers.
Sure you have a grasp of the business aspects of the Mayweathers and calling me ignorant, does it mean it makes it so? NO.
I, as a pugilist purist, am happy to see Mayweather to fight Mosley. I would hope to see them fight and would hope that the winner would fight the winner of Pacquiao/Clottey fight towards the pound for pound fight for the ages.
As an Ali fan growing up and seeing him fight LIVE in Thrilla in Manila as a 7 year old it has made an indelible mark in my mind that forever tagged me as a boxing fan, nothing more, nothing less.
I would love to see a MASTER OF DEFENSE in Mayweather fight against the relentless and blitzing style of boxing Pacquiao has.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Respectfully...
Comment