How did you score Calzaghe-Hopkins?

[-DSG-]

on the real calzaghe couldnt land anything and was throwing punches pretty girly lol. but bernard was fighting really dirty i count at least 5 or 6 low blows by the 5th round not a very pleasing fight

[MARKBNLV]

Hopkins piled up the early rds 114-113 hopkins JIM

[Joeyzagz]

Not even close. Bernard SLopkins was a cheating Bastard and shouldve been deducted points for being a Douche bag.

[Pugilistic™]

Close fight. could of went either way.

The majority feel Calzaghe outworked Hopkins to a close decision.

Hopkins argueably won due to his cleaner more effective punches and Calzaghe argueably won due to pressing the action and throwing more than Hopkins in most of the rounds.

[fugu]

People that think Hopkins won this should just suicide.

[Easy-E]

Its not really a scoring criteria.

Are you kidding me? This is what is wrong with so many boxing fans.
4 Criteria of scoring fights are:

Clean Punching
Effective Agression
Ring Generalship
Defense

[razor.thin]

lol @ anyone who thought borehard won. for a start they must be black secondly they are biased.

I had B-Hop winning, 114-113.

my theory prooves true

[Easy-E]

This fight was about more than workrate. Joe was throwing and landing combos on Bhop, and even though not all the punches landed cleanly, and Hop was landing in single digits. This fight was NOT about workrate, as no fight is about workrate, it is not a scoring criteria.

[The_Demon]

Not even close. Bernard SLopkins was a cheating Bastard and shouldve been deducted points for being a Douche bag.

not at all mate,faking low blows for a breather and an attempt too get points deducted from your opponent is cool haha

imagine the hate for calzaghe if he had done that,he would have been slaughtered

[razor.thin]

so far only black people thought hopkins won, isn't byrd black too? the only judge who scored for hopkins?