Comments Thread For: The Top 25 Middleweights of All-Time – The Top Ten
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
How the hell is possibile that Nino Benvenuti is not there? the man conquered the title once in 1967 and again from 1968 to 1970
W Emile Griffith x2 (UD, UD)
W Don Fullmer (UD)
W Fraser Scott (DQ)
W Rodriguez (KO)
W Bethea (ko)
L Emile griffith 8MD)
L Carlos Monzon x2 (KO, KO)
how is this possibile?
this isn't possibile.Comment
-
This list is kinda like saying Babe Ruth was a better hitter than Barry Bonds. It's obvious that Bonds has a better record than Ruth but Ruth is much more of a purists choice. No steroid accusations, in the heyday of the sport, etc.
Not saying that I disagree with this list, but I also can't really agree with it as I have no idea the level of opposition most of these old school fighters fought.Comment
-
By Cliff Rold - For any new boxing fan, the time is not long before a fellow fan points out a magic number which grows more mythologized with time: eight. As in boxing’s original eight weight classes. The number represents in the mind of many a time when the sport was compressed into fields which couldn’t help but be talented, couldn’t help but draw crowds, because there were so few places on the scale to go. They were divisions marked by single champions ever challenged by a depth of contenders today’s seventeen weight classes rarely know. [Click Here To Read More]
I like your list-up to point.
I certainly would have switched Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins. Benvenuti should have been in the iop 10 or 15. His KO of Luis Rodriguez was first class. I would have dropped Sugar Ray Robinson 4=6 places, since, although he won the title so many times he also lost the title nearly as many times as he won it. In Turpin 2 he was on the way to losing when he pulled off that stoppage. The same with the Fullmer K.O. I'd have had Laszlo Papp in tnere somewhere.
I think I've asked you about boxing contacts in Panama, I'm moving there at the end of this month. You didn't reply.Comment
Comment