MAB didnt beat him twice. They split. I thought the loser really won both fights
If Erik Morales was so great......
Collapse
-
I thought EM was robbed in the 2nd fight so the promoters can make more money and force a trilogy, because if EM gets the decision that gives him 2 wins over MAB and no point for a rubber match. I had Morales winning the first fight by one point, but i havent seen that fight in years so i will watch it again and make a determination.Comment
-
Comment
-
Could someone please explain what the above comment means.Comment
-
LMAO at these Morales fans claiming that Morales was robbed in their second fight while he deserved the decision in their first fight.Their first fight wasn't remotely close,barrera beat the crap out of him and topped the evening with a knockdown and Morales was given a gift decision.
Morales never convincingly beat barrera because he wasn't good enough to do so.The closest he came was when barrera arse'd about in their second fight and even then barrera came back to dominate.Comment
-
Ive never seen erik lose a poll to barrera to be honest with u...the rest of the world see's Erik as the more acclompished fighter..he got screwed out of his 4title too..Erik IS the better fighter...period.LMAO at these Morales fans claiming that Morales was robbed in their second fight while he deserved the decision in their first fight.Their first fight wasn't remotely close,barrera beat the crap out of him and topped the evening with a knockdown and Morales was given a gift decision.
Morales never convincingly beat barrera because he wasn't good enough to do so.The closest he came was when barrera arse'd about in their second fight and even then barrera came back to dominate.Comment
-
And yet he had three attempts to prove that he was the better fighter and he always came up short against his daddy.Popularity poll's don't mean anything.
I'd like to see this worldwide poll you conducted tho.Comment

Comment