Let's all vote for a drug testing solution! Mayweather vs Pacquiao (OFFICIAL POLL)

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shadeyfizzle
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 7448
    • 160
    • 43
    • 13,959

    #21
    1st off noone on either side has really rejected the "random" portion of the proposed drug tests on either side. It's the fact that it's coupled with the amount of tests they'd like to run.

    I say 1 random blood test anytime between now and 3 days before the fight and 1 immediately after the fight should be sufficient.

    And the people who say the 3day cutoff date undermines the whole "random" portion of it because he can roid then.....think again. There wouldnt even be a point in roiding 3days before a fight because you would get very minimal to no results from it in that short of time span when they're winding down their workload anyway plus they get tested immediately after the fight.

    Comment

    • #1Assassin
      Conveyor of Truth
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 8019
      • 647
      • 264
      • 20,993

      #22
      that would be very fair, but pacs ppl dont want random tests. they claim its the needles, then its being to close to the fight or will interrupt training etc etc.. they just dont want random testing, and i wouldnt be surprised if they acctually dont want the fight at all. they were very quick to call it of and lawyer up, further preventing a fight.

      Comment

      • USADA
        Banned
        • Dec 2009
        • 302
        • 20
        • 6
        • 535

        #23
        Originally posted by shadeyfizzle
        1st off noone on either side has really rejected the "random" portion of the proposed drug tests on either side. It's the fact that it's coupled with the amount of tests they'd like to run.

        I say 1 random blood test anytime between now and 3 days before the fight and 1 immediately after the fight should be sufficient.

        And the people who say the 3day cutoff date undermines the whole "random" portion of it because he can roid then.....think again. There wouldnt even be a point in roiding 3days before a fight because you would get very minimal to no results from it in that short of time span when they're winding down their workload anyway plus they get tested immediately after the fight.
        Unfortunately, what I put in bold is incorrect.

        The recent statement from Pacquiao is that he wants a 30 day window between the press conference and the day after the fight. He has just scheduled the "random" dates. You can see where that is severely flawed.

        Hopefully, they can meet in the middle. I feel my suggested solution is fair to both sides.

        Comment

        • Mrmza
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 222
          • 9
          • 0
          • 6,306

          #24
          Another stoopid ass ***** Boy Gayweather fan trying in vain to validate Gayweather's excuses! Give up already you dumb ass idiotic twits!! USADA is on the Gayweather payroll!! And you ***** Boy fans think this is all for the fairness of the fight!! Innocent until proven guilty you fools!! Until then shut your pie holes and recognize a real champ when you see one!! And that is Manny Pacquiao!!!!!!
          USADA....lmfao!!!!

          Comment

          • USADA
            Banned
            • Dec 2009
            • 302
            • 20
            • 6
            • 535

            #25
            Originally posted by Mrmza
            Another stoopid ass ***** Boy Gayweather fan trying in vain to validate Gayweather's excuses! Give up already you dumb ass idiotic twits!! USADA is on the Gayweather payroll!! And you ***** Boy fans think this is all for the fairness of the fight!! Innocent until proven guilty you fools!! Until then shut your pie holes and recognize a real champ when you see one!! And that is Manny Pacquiao!!!!!!
            USADA....lmfao!!!!

            I don't think anyone with a brain would even give any importance to the childish nonsense you have written, but for you to claim that the USADA is on Mayweather's payroll is beyond ignorant.

            Please, if that's all you have to say, don't bother.

            Comment

            • Mrmza
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 222
              • 9
              • 0
              • 6,306

              #26
              Originally posted by USADA

              I don't think anyone with a brain would even give any importance to the childish nonsense you have written, but for you to claim that the USADA is on Mayweather's payroll is beyond ignorant.

              Please, if that's all you have to say, don't bother.
              Are you kidding me??? Dude you need to keep up with the news! USADA was hired by the Gayweathers!! Now why would or should Team Pacquiao go with their recommendation given the background of the Gayweathers?? Why?? And why would the current P4P King submit to a "challenger's" request?? Why?? I'll tell you mate, smoke & mirrors!!! That is all the Gayweathers are trying to achieve. Not a level of fairness. That's just bull****! They're digging a hole deep enough to crawl into. Gayweather fan, you need to hush and let destiny roll!!

              Comment

              • USADA
                Banned
                • Dec 2009
                • 302
                • 20
                • 6
                • 535

                #27
                Bump!

                Keep it clean folks.

                Comment

                • Mrmza
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 222
                  • 9
                  • 0
                  • 6,306

                  #28
                  Originally posted by USADA
                  Bump!

                  Keep it clean folks.
                  Yep thought so...hussshh

                  Comment

                  • USADA
                    Banned
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 302
                    • 20
                    • 6
                    • 535

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Mrmza
                    Yep thought so...hussshh
                    You thought so?

                    Comment

                    • Dondi33O
                      Banned
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 1438
                      • 78
                      • 19
                      • 1,664

                      #30
                      I say they should do no testing at all, and dont check the hand wraps either.

                      Let them both do whatever they want to give themselves an advantage to win and let them fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP