The only thing I know if true is that since beating Cotto, Team Pacquiao has been hard at work flushing any trace of Roids out of Manny's system. By the time he finally takes his scheduled everyone knows its coming blood test, I'm sure he'll be clean as a whistle.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Plans Legal Battle With Mayweathers, Golden Boy
Collapse
-
Under the First ********* of the United States Constitution, as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1964 Case, New York Times v Sullivan, where a public figure attempts to bring an action for defamation, the public figure must prove an additional element: That the statement was made with "actual malice". In translation, that means that the person making the statement knew the statement to be false, or issued the statement with reckless disregard as to its truth.Comment
-
Pacquiao has slandered himself by refusing to take RANDOM TestsComment
-
u mean defamation!!!!!!!!Comment
-
my point? the mayweathers better get a damn good lawyer.Comment
-
facts my ass !!!! LOL
prove it in court. we gonna witness your crack head and ex convict family pay a heavy fine...... and your crying of roids will shatter your delusional thinking of " OH God please put pac on roids so my BF can get away " LOL
Comment
-
lol it would be pretty funny if they are both in court and it's shown on 24/7. It'll boost the ratings higher than life.Comment
-
the only way Pac would have a case against floyd senior is if his comments were 'slander per se'
these would include comments that are so inherently harmful such as the plaintiff
(1) has a loathsome, communicable disease
(2) has committed a crime for which imprisonment is a possibility
(3) is professionally incompetent
(4) if a woman, has engaged in sexual misconduct
his comments fall in non of these categories and his comments were not made with malice (no way of knowing these comments are 100% false) so he will be protected by the public figure privilege...sorry pacComment
-
Defamation is the issuance of a false statement about another person, which causes that person to suffer harm.
Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation.
Libel involves the making of defamatory statements in a printed or fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper.Comment
Comment