Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Plans Legal Battle With Mayweathers, Golden Boy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    The only thing I know if true is that since beating Cotto, Team Pacquiao has been hard at work flushing any trace of Roids out of Manny's system. By the time he finally takes his scheduled everyone knows its coming blood test, I'm sure he'll be clean as a whistle.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Killa_Kali View Post
      Under the First ********* of the United States Constitution, as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1964 Case, New York Times v Sullivan, where a public figure attempts to bring an action for defamation, the public figure must prove an additional element: That the statement was made with "actual malice". In translation, that means that the person making the statement knew the statement to be false, or issued the statement with reckless disregard as to its truth.
      and what did you wikipedia the definition of the word i gave you...way to rely on the internet

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by fabie View Post
        SLANDERING is the word. To accuse someone of drugs without proof is just that. And to affect someone in direct relationship to one's reputation and his ability to earn an income and notoriety at risk...

        Now Mayweather Sr wished he didn't say anything at all...
        Pacquiao has slandered himself by refusing to take RANDOM Tests

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by fabie View Post
          SLANDERING is the word. To accuse someone of drugs without proof is just that. And to affect someone in direct relationship to one's reputation and his ability to earn an income and notoriety at risk...

          Now Mayweather Sr wished he didn't say anything at all...
          u mean defamation!!!!!!!!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by onedream722 View Post
            actual malice when malignaggi said it as well? and how in the hell would he know the statement is false....was jose canseco sued from his book???? how would he know ALL those players juiced? GTFO with ur nonsense
            pac is suing the mayweathers. not malignaggi. they should have sued canseco if he did not have proof.

            Originally posted by onedream722 View Post
            so did every baseball player in the Mitchell Report...so what's your point?

            so did vargas so did toney..so did mosley
            my point? the mayweathers better get a damn good lawyer.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Silky-Flow View Post
              Take pac's **** out of your mouth and get with reality, what i wrote was nothing but FACTS, but as always *******s have a hard time understanding the truth, pom-pom shacking seems like every *******s mission these days .

              facts my ass !!!! LOL

              prove it in court. we gonna witness your crack head and ex convict family pay a heavy fine...... and your crying of roids will shatter your delusional thinking of " OH God please put pac on roids so my BF can get away " LOL

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Ether View Post
                KJ, this news is hilarious. Come on, this should be incouraged. I can just see mayweather in a business suit in court already lol..

                It's gonna cut into pac's image. I hope to god Pacquiao tries and sues Mayweather.
                lol it would be pretty funny if they are both in court and it's shown on 24/7. It'll boost the ratings higher than life.

                Comment


                • #68
                  the only way Pac would have a case against floyd senior is if his comments were 'slander per se'
                  these would include comments that are so inherently harmful such as the plaintiff
                  (1) has a loathsome, communicable disease
                  (2) has committed a crime for which imprisonment is a possibility
                  (3) is professionally incompetent
                  (4) if a woman, has engaged in sexual misconduct

                  his comments fall in non of these categories and his comments were not made with malice (no way of knowing these comments are 100% false) so he will be protected by the public figure privilege...sorry pac

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by onedream722 View Post
                    u mean defamation!!!!!!!!

                    Defamation is the issuance of a false statement about another person, which causes that person to suffer harm.

                    Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation.

                    Libel involves the making of defamatory statements in a printed or fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by M.I.C. View Post
                      Pacquiao has slandered himself by refusing to take RANDOM Tests
                      so pac has no freedom now LOL

                      fl****s are crying LOL

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP