Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Closing 2009 - BoxingScene’s Pound for Pound Top Ten

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Where is Amir? Not putting Amir Khan on the list is just pure hating.

    Comment


    • #32
      its not fair, mayweather jr. should be in number 1 spot wth

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
        By Cliff Rold - With the significant results for the year tallied, and the anticipation for 2010 already building, this marks the final look at the top fighters in the sport for this year.

        Not much has changed since Manny Pacquiao’s Welterweight win over Miguel Cotto provided the last shake up, but there has been enough in December to merit some shifts in the ratings. While others move, only one departs.

        Exiting the top ten is Cotto. It is no insult to Cotto. The Puerto Rican star has faced a tougher field of comp over the last few years than almost anyone in the sport and deserves full credit for it, but the reality is he has also taken full punishment in the ring. Resume does not, in this case, overcome the combination of the performances of another and two brutal stoppage losses in Cotto’s last four fights. [Click Here To Read More]
        Nothing outrageous there, pretty much what people had anyway. All in all good top 10.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by iskucha03 View Post
          its not fair, mayweather jr. should be in number 1 spot wth


          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by ~Alar~ View Post
            Always found it quite ignorant opinion... Nothing personal... But try to imagine if you try to make Wlad smaller... He has good footwork, nice left hook, ATG jab, explosive right hand, very athletic, weak chin and etc... As you are "making him smaller" you should add some speed... And, can you guess, whom are you getting?

            Thomas Hearns, but white...

            Yeah... Tommy was a tomato can who got his ass kicked every time he stepped into the ring...

            A good big fighter will always look sillier than the good small fighter, despite the fact that the good big man always beats the good small man. If you try to compare fighters of the different weight classes you should think about the speed changes, which will obviously "occur"... And if you do that, any of the Klits is not going to get their ass kicked for the reasons, which surprisingly aren`t obvious for everybody... Damn, both Marciano and Foreman weren`t lightning-fast... Does it mean they would have their ass kicked if "transormed" into smaller men?

            If Wlad made a 53(47)-3-0 record by accident, how can one call... say, Joe Calzaghe`s career? Misunderstanding?
            I disagree. Ali, Holyfield, Johnson (for example)...all had elite level speed in any class and rarely looked silly against anyone. As to Tommy Hearns, I don't see the comparison to Wlad at all. He fought successfully across six modern weight classes and was a balls out guy against largely great opposition with one black mark opponent (Barkley); he was a killer who decapitated some HOFers. Wlad fights skittish against the worst Heavyweight field in history.

            His record is not an accident. He's a good Heavyweight and may end up a great one. I just don't know if there's anything great about him outside the class. If one views P4P as a list of relative accomplishments alone, a case can be made. I see it different.
            Last edited by crold1; 12-21-2009, 10:24 AM.

            Comment


            • #36
              I'm sorry but who is Hozumi Hasegawa? And why is he is the p4p10 list.

              Why would you bump Cotto and make room for this guy?

              And I'm sorry but I still don't understand all the hype over Dawson. He is a good fighter but I just don't see him up there and even if he is in the list why is he #5.

              Bradley for as good as he is should be maybe in the 15-20 list not top 10.

              Gamboa and Berto on the "could be here shortly" list;; not if their hype train gets derailed first.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by lern1079 View Post
                I'm sorry but who is Hozumi Hasegawa? And why is he is the p4p10 list.

                Why would you bump Cotto and make room for this guy?

                And I'm sorry but I still don't understand all the hype over Dawson. He is a good fighter but I just don't see him up there and even if he is in the list why is he #5.

                Bradley for as good as he is should be maybe in the 15-20 list not top 10.

                Gamboa and Berto on the "could be here shortly" list;; not if their hype train gets derailed first.
                Hasegawa belongs there. Bradley is no.10 in my opinion.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by lern1079 View Post
                  I'm sorry but who is Hozumi Hasegawa? And why is he is the p4p10 list.

                  Why would you bump Cotto and make room for this guy?

                  And I'm sorry but I still don't understand all the hype over Dawson. He is a good fighter but I just don't see him up there and even if he is in the list why is he #5.

                  Bradley for as good as he is should be maybe in the 15-20 list not top 10.

                  Gamboa and Berto on the "could be here shortly" list;; not if their hype train gets derailed first.
                  I find it funny...people who know who Hasegawa is are cool with his placement. Those who don't need to look him up. He's the goods. Boxing doesn't stop off English speaking TV.

                  As to Gamboa and Berto, I agree entirely. They are both positioned in 2010 to either rise to the occasion or be exposed as not belonging. That's the fun of the sport.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    how is dawson so high?
                    his last four opponents have been 40 years old.
                    and he won, although not in impressive fashion as he should have.
                    you cant rate a guy on his potential.

                    this brings me to williams.
                    he lost to martinez, a junior middleweight.
                    i dont get it.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by amayseng View Post
                      how is dawson so high?
                      his last four opponents have been 40 years old.
                      and he won, although not in impressive fashion as he should have.
                      you cant rate a guy on his potential.

                      this brings me to williams.
                      he lost to martinez, a junior middleweight.
                      i dont get it.
                      I had him beating Martinez by a point. As to DAwson, those 40 year olds were still pretty good, and Adamek was a whitewash minus the knockdown. He's well beyond potential at this point.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP