Pac lost to Erik because...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Easy-E
    Gotta want it
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 22686
    • 865
    • 1,739
    • 32,777

    #61
    Originally posted by Chups
    Old topic...as usual Easy-E is very biased................here's an unbiased scorecards.


    Doug Fischer of maxboxing.com - 114-114 Draw
    http://www.maxboxing.com/Fischer/Fischer031708.asp

    Brad Cooney of Cooney Entertainment - Draw


    Harold Lederman of HBO (not his article but mentioned in it) - 115-112 for Pacquiao
    http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxin...beats-marquez/

    Dan Rafael of espn.com – 114-113 for Marquez


    Steve Kim of maxboxing.com – 115-112 for Pacquiao
    http://www.maxboxing.com/Kim/Kim031708.asp

    The Arizona Republic – 114-113 for Marquez


    Jeff Haney of Las Vegas Sun - 114-113 for Pacquiao
    http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008...ng-title-bout/

    Ricardo Lois of ******************.com – 115-112 for Marquez
    http://www.******************.com/articles.php?id=4125

    Michael Marley of ******************.com – 114-113 for Pacquiao
    http://www.******************.com/articles.php?id=4132

    SC of badlefthook.com – 114-113 for Marquez


    Ace Freeman of fightfan.com – 115-112 for Pacquiao


    Victor Perea of *********.com - 115-113 for Marquez
    http://www.*********extra.com/cc/FIG...ao-marquez.htm

    ‘Undisputed’ of doghouseboxing.com – 115-114 for Pacquiao


    Bart Barry of 15rounds.com – 115-113 for Marquez
    http://15rounds.com/Columns/bbarry/aggressor-031708.php

    Ben Thompson of fighthype.com – 114-113 for Pacquiao


    Tim Starks of mvn - 114-113 for Marquez
    http://mvn.com/boxing/2008/03/17/the...anny-pacquiao/

    Aaron Jones of *********.com – 115-112 for Pacquiao
    http://www.*********.com/article_detail.php?AT=603
    In case you couldnt figure it out, my post was in response to Lady Fan saying that everyone scored it a close fight for Manny. I am aware that people in Press row scored the fight for Manny, but the majority of press row had JMM winning.

    Comment

    • ummmid
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 856
      • 98
      • 112
      • 1,147

      #62
      Originally posted by Chups
      Old topic...as usual Easy-E is very biased................here's an unbiased scorecards.


      Doug Fischer of maxboxing.com - 114-114 Draw
      http://www.maxboxing.com/Fischer/Fischer031708.asp

      Brad Cooney of Cooney Entertainment - Draw


      Harold Lederman of HBO (not his article but mentioned in it) - 115-112 for Pacquiao
      http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxin...beats-marquez/

      Dan Rafael of espn.com – 114-113 for Marquez


      Steve Kim of maxboxing.com – 115-112 for Pacquiao
      http://www.maxboxing.com/Kim/Kim031708.asp

      The Arizona Republic – 114-113 for Marquez


      Jeff Haney of Las Vegas Sun - 114-113 for Pacquiao
      http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008...ng-title-bout/

      Ricardo Lois of ******************.com – 115-112 for Marquez
      http://www.******************.com/articles.php?id=4125

      Michael Marley of ******************.com – 114-113 for Pacquiao
      http://www.******************.com/articles.php?id=4132

      SC of badlefthook.com – 114-113 for Marquez


      Ace Freeman of fightfan.com – 115-112 for Pacquiao


      Victor Perea of *********.com - 115-113 for Marquez
      http://www.*********extra.com/cc/FIG...ao-marquez.htm

      ‘Undisputed’ of doghouseboxing.com – 115-114 for Pacquiao


      Bart Barry of 15rounds.com – 115-113 for Marquez
      http://15rounds.com/Columns/bbarry/aggressor-031708.php

      Ben Thompson of fighthype.com – 114-113 for Pacquiao


      Tim Starks of mvn - 114-113 for Marquez
      http://mvn.com/boxing/2008/03/17/the...anny-pacquiao/

      Aaron Jones of *********.com – 115-112 for Pacquiao
      http://www.*********.com/article_detail.php?AT=603
      you're biased. we all know only the scorecards that say marquez won the fight matters, they even had some filipinos/sri lankan agreeing with them so it must be accurate.

      Comment

      • Foodie One
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 1871
        • 130
        • 10
        • 5,049

        #63
        Originally posted by Easy-E
        In case you couldnt figure it out, my post was in response to Lady Fan saying that everyone scored it a close fight for Manny. I am aware that people in Press row scored the fight for Manny, but the majority of press row had JMM winning.
        All of those scores you presented are subjective. The scores that actually count are the official judges at ringside. If you were to poll viewers of the second fight, most would vote in favor of a Pacman victory due to the knockdown early in the fight plus the wobbling Marquez received in the 10th round. Marquez was unable to show any kind of "DOMINANCE" over the Pacman thus losing in a closely contested battle. JAT



        Comment

        • Chups
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 18400
          • 1,835
          • 1,281
          • 52,879

          #64
          Originally posted by ummmid
          you're biased. we all know only the scorecards that say marquez won the fight matters, they even had some filipinos/sri lankan agreeing with them so it must be accurate.
          Very True. I shouldn't have posted the scores that favored Pac.

          Comment

          • Easy-E
            Gotta want it
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 22686
            • 865
            • 1,739
            • 32,777

            #65
            Originally posted by Lady Fan
            All of those scores you presented are subjective. The scores that actually count are the official judges at ringside. If you were to poll viewers of the second fight, most would vote in favor of a Pacman victory due to the knockdown early in the fight plus the wobbling Marquez received in the 10th round. Marquez was unable to show any kind of "DOMINANCE" over the Pacman thus losing in a closely contested battle. JAT



            Talk about subjective.

            You claimed that "everyone had the fight close but in favor of Pac."
            I provided evidence that this is inaccurate. The majority of press row scored the fight for Marquez, and one judge did too. I provided factual evidence

            You then make a claim completly void of evidence or fact saying that if viewers were polled that this would happen... With absolutly no evidence.

            I never made any comments about dominance, as they were both close fights that neither fighter proved dominant.

            Comment

            • Chups
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2004
              • 18400
              • 1,835
              • 1,281
              • 52,879

              #66
              Originally posted by Makavelli
              where is Victor nowadays? i miss talkin boxing with that dude
              Yeah I met the guy....he's cool. He's not active in Pacland anymore.

              Comment

              • Easy-E
                Gotta want it
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 22686
                • 865
                • 1,739
                • 32,777

                #67
                Originally posted by ummmid
                you're biased. we all know only the scorecards that say marquez won the fight matters, they even had some filipinos/sri lankan agreeing with them so it must be accurate.
                did I ever say that? no.
                did I ever imply that? no.
                I posted those cards in response to a poster claiming that everyone had the fight scored for Pac.
                When you dont read posts and make comments, it makes you look both ignorant and ******.

                Comment

                • lacson
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 703
                  • 22
                  • 1
                  • 8,257

                  #68
                  Why are people even discussing this. Obviously Manny wasn't at his prime. His latest performance seems to be always better than his last, so far his prime is now but then again we don't know until after the Mayweather fight. Will he be better than his last fight again? We won't know his prime until he starts going down hill.

                  Regarding the first Morales fight, the head butt occurred in the fifth which was ruled a punch by Cortez. Manny himself said, he couldn't see well out of that right eye and was eating Morales' lefts. But even with that it was a close fight, one round diff, while others thought Manny did enough to win. Anyways prime means when a fighter is at the top of his game, his best. For Manny that is now.

                  By the way Mayweather is Pacquiao's secret number one fan, you want to see proof, watch Pac Morales 2, especially the 10th round. Mayweather was the only crazed fan, jumping up and down on his seat, he gets more excited than Wahlberg for crying out loud.

                  Comment

                  • pasawayako
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 15348
                    • 639
                    • 194
                    • 151,963

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Nightelf
                    ..atleast what i say are FACTS..not one ****sexual comment about floyd threads day after day..why dont u complain about that..the world NEEDS to know that pacquiao is an overated clown and i will tell them JUST THAT..

                    and pac lost to erik cause erik is the better fighter with a MUCH better resume
                    LOL....

                    Comment

                    • YoungReezy
                      Banned
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 777
                      • 179
                      • 88
                      • 1,030

                      #70
                      Originally posted by lacson
                      Why are people even discussing this. Obviously Manny wasn't at his prime. His latest performance seems to be always better than his last, so far his prime is now but then again we don't know until after the Mayweather fight. Will he be better than his last fight again? We won't know his prime until he starts going down hill.

                      Regarding the first Morales fight, the head butt occurred in the fifth which was ruled a punch by Cortez. Manny himself said, he couldn't see well out of that right eye and was eating Morales' lefts. But even with that it was a close fight, one round diff, while others thought Manny did enough to win. Anyways prime means when a fighter is at the top of his game, his best. For Manny that is now.

                      By the way Mayweather is Pacquiao's secret number one fan, you want to see proof, watch Pac Morales 2, especially the 10th round. Mayweather was the only crazed fan, jumping up and down on his seat, he gets more excited than Wahlberg for crying out loud.
                      Dude I don't know, Pac didn't look too fast against Cotto, but ****, even a slow Pac is still a very fast Pac. I persona;;y think his hands are faster than Floyds when he throws combos, Floyd potshots quick though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP