Pac lost to Erik because...

[Left Hook Tua]

He outclassed MAB.

You're funny though.

barrera would have beat him anytime before 2005 or 2006.

[Glamour Puss]

I think that the bad cut affected the Pacman too much. If it weren't for that, he would have won that fight. In the other 2 fights, the Pacman was too dominant, too fast & powerful for the very strong Morales. This Trilogy of fights should have been a "Clean Sweep" for Team Pacquiao. JAT

LOL, the cut was caused by a punch. Nice excuse though.

And again, in the second fight Morales was leading on all cards at the time he got caught.

Packy was lucky to be in there with a shot version of EM.

[Glamour Puss]

barrera would have beat him anytime before 2005 or 2006.

Never.

JMM is too good for him.

[-Antonio-]

He didn't get outclassed or even close to it. Sometmes I wonder if people really watched this fight. It was very close most rounds. Morales gave slightly more than he took.

I think it was a combination of Morales being done and Pac attacking the body more in the second fight. Morales was definitely on the slide, and by the second fight making weght was a fight before the fight itself.

[brown mamba]

coming from a guy who thought raheem beat morales before pac-morales 1. anyone with a brain can see that pac isnt AS one-dimensional as he was before. watch the fight and tell me he hasnt made significant improvements.

[Nightelf]

don't you get bored posting the same **** over and over again?

switch it up.

troll against pac one day , then maybe hatton the next , calzaghe the next , cotto next time out.

variety trolling , my friend.

..atleast what i say are FACTS..not one ****sexual comment about floyd threads day after day..why dont u complain about that..the world NEEDS to know that pacquiao is an overated clown and i will tell them JUST THAT..

and pac lost to erik cause erik is the better fighter with a MUCH better resume

[Left Hook Tua]

Never.

JMM is too good for him.

jmm at his peak got dropped by a past it barrera.

[Left Hook Tua]

..atleast what i say are FACTS..not one ****sexual comment about floyd threads day after day..why dont u complain about that..the world NEEDS to know that pacquiao is an overated clown and i will tell them JUST THAT..

and pac lost to erik cause erik is the better fighter with a MUCH better resume

you don't state facts. you state your opinion.

i don't like floyd. why would i complain about anti-floyd posts?



that said people need to quit it with the floyd is gay talk. let the man be on his sexuality. let's talk about his boxing and his fights not about him blowing ray j or getting ****** by 50 cent. peace.

[Foodie One]

Packy lost to JMM TWICE.

I'll never concede anything else. JMM mastered him.

In actuality, the Pacman was "Ripped-Off" no pun intended Ripper, in the first fight when a judging error caused the draw. Pacman won that fight. In the second match, the knockdown of Marquez was the deciding factor that gave the Pacman his second victory over Marquez. Mastered the Pacman? That's your opinion but everyone saw very close matches in favor of the Pacman. JAT

[ummmid]

He outclassed MAB.

You're funny though.

he may have have outclassed MAB but MAB looked so much like a dog in heat that night next to a violated JMM that the referee here looked alot like elliot stabler.

[IMG]http://img.***********.com/albums/v511/ummid/Marco-Antonio-Barrera-Marquez22.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img.***********.com/albums/v511/ummid/51VW02XtB6L_SX320_SY240_.jpg[/IMG]