He thought Erik was done after the losses to Barrera, and the loss in his tune up, Pac thought he could come in over aggressive and blow Erik away, but Erik counter punced Pac and schooled him, I think that was both Pac and roach's wake up call!
Pac lost to Erik because...
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
you can accuse pacquiao of being excellently managed in recent years but you cannot do this before 2006.
the truth of the matter is pacquiao never had a great promoter 'til 2006 when he sued muhammad and signed with arum.
the reason pacquiao fought morales , marquez , barrera pretty much back to back to back is not because of any grand plan to promote pacquiao.
muhammad his promoter was milking pacquiao for all he could.
he just threw pacquiao in with the biggest money he can make from.Comment
-
Yea it was a very good wake up call considering Pac than KOed the **** out of him and than made him quit in the middle of the round in their 3rd fight. I agree Erik worked Pac over in that first fight but after that it was all PacComment
-
Good luck convincing the Pacfans. They say Pac was "not in his prime" and the headbutt was the cause of the loss, and that he was distracted, and a whole bunch of other ****, they can't admit that EM was just the better man that night, *** NO!Comment
Comment