Erik morales > Barerra.

[MANGLER]

That list is no good. JMM went all the way up to 35 and dominated. Em and Mab couldn't do much past 26' and didn't have the longevity of JMM.

JMM is dominating in his late 30's.

JMM's longevity>EM and MAB.

But he last in place far as res goes Dap.

[Glamour Puss]

barrera won the first, Erik won the 2nd and in the 3rd, they should have DQd Marco for rabbit punches



true story

Actually you're right. I remember now cuz' they basically got the decisions in the wrong order. Mab won the 1st, EM won the second.."unofficially"

[Glamour Puss]

JMM's longevity>EM and MAB.

But he last in place far as res goes Dap.

Casa and Diaz vault him above imo.

Plus the way he fought Packy was more impressive than the other 2.

[araindon]

Morales>Barrera>Marquez....but to me its razor thin. Morales has a better resume in my opinion and his trioligy with Barrera was so damn close.

[Zarco]

the only reason morales beat pacquiao was because marquez helped him, morales watched round 1 of Marquez-Pacquiao for days, and that basiacally sealed his last hurrah.

[dde91]

Barrera beat Marquez. Knocked him down, outboxed him. Won on my card. That round should have been a 10-8 round for Barrera but ended up a 10-8 round because the ref didn't see the knockdown and took a point away from Barrera. So that would be two point. Even tho the points wouldn't have mattered on the scorecards because Barrera would have still lost 113-114 on two cars and 113-116. I think that Marquez would have been shook up if he didn't get time because Barrera caught him with a Clean Shot.

[prinzmanspoper]

I'm sure that the Barrera fanboys are simply winding me up here.They know of my dislike that I have for Marcy and are coaxing me into giving him credit.I have yet to see somebody state a convincing argument as to how Morales was a greater fighter than Barrera.Let's be perfectly honest here,Barrera beat Morales convincingly during their first fight,he outfought Morales and capped it off with a knockdown and there is no possible way to give credit to Morales for beating Barrera in their first meeting because he never did.Their second fight was crap and as I remember Barrera was giving the first half rounds of the fight to Morales and rallied strong,now perhaps Morales deserved the decision but it was nowhere near as bad as their first fight.The really is no debate about their third fight as Barrera won it clearly.

Both me are overrated but there was a clear victor in their trilogy and the superior fighter emerged and that was Marcy Antonita Barrera.

[713832281]

1.morales
2.jmm
3.barrera

[Glamour Puss]

Barrera beat Marquez. Knocked him down, outboxed him. Won on my card. That round should have been a 10-8 round for Barrera but ended up a 10-8 round because the ref didn't see the knockdown and took a point away from Barrera. So that would be two point. Even tho the points wouldn't have mattered on the scorecards because Barrera would have still lost 113-114 on two cars and 113-116. I think that Marquez would have been shook up if he didn't get time because Barrera caught him with a Clean Shot.

Are you crazy? JMM was on his way to a 10-8 round. Then Barrera evened it. Then he lost the point he JUST gained by hitting JMM on the floor.

The rest of your post is just insane.

JMM outclassed Barrera. 118-110 was the best score. Barrera got schooled by a master.

[2120]

1. Morales 2. Barrera 3. Marquez

That's the ranking



Morales-------Barrera------Marquez

Pacquiao(27)----Hamed-------Barrera(33)
Barrera ---------Morales--------Cassamayor(37)
Jones ----------McKinney-------J.Diaz
Chavez --------Tapia ----------Medina
Zaragoza ------Salud ----------Gainer
Chi -------------- Ayala ---------Juarez
Hernandez----- Juarez ----------Peden
McCullough-----A. Sanchez------Salido
Ayala -----------Peden ----------Polo



----------1----------2----------3

I agree with morales being number on but why did you not compare all three of them with common opponents

if you did it would read like this erik, jmm, and mab clearly being third

jmm clearly beat peden, a.sanchez, juarez and fared better against pac than mab ever did.

erik also out performed marco against ayala, j.jones, pac,

two things that mab resume has over Marquez are his victories over morales and naz

so based on those two win i see why people would have it erik , mab, and marquez

but i have it erik, marquez, and mab based on the fact that both erik and marquez out performed mab with their common opponents