Bernard Hopkins; The Executioner??
Collapse
-
Comment
-
But against who? Lipsey who?? he did not look like no executioner against Jones, Taylor or Tarver... He fought brilliant against Pavlik and Trinidad but still, did not remind me of an executioner.
and also, i could show you about a lot of 36 second videos showing calzaghe knocking people out while "slapping like a girl" just as well as you can show me Hopkins as a real "executioner"Comment
-
-
Hopkins took people apart in his younger days. He was definetely a Executioner then.
Hopkins in his prime became a master boxer who could do pretty much everything in the ring.
Once Hopkins got older though, he had to become more defensive which why he fights the way he does now.
I gues you could say Hopkins is still a Executioner because he is good at executing gameplans against his opponents.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Pretty much everyone at middleweight besides roy jones
Taylor
Tarver...
He fought brilliant against Pavlik
and Trinidad
and also, i could show you about a lot of 36 second videos showing calzaghe knocking people out while "slapping like a girl" just as well as you can show me Hopkins as a real "executioner"Comment
-
Hopkins took people apart in his younger days. He was definetely a Executioner then.
Hopkins in his prime became a master boxer who could do pretty much everything in the ring.
Once Hopkins got older though, he had to become more defensive which why he fights the way he does now.
I gues you could say Hopkins is still a Executioner because he is good at executing gameplans against his opponents.
and neither did he against any of the fighters i mentioned earlier.. So one could say:
Yes, you are right, he was an executioner, just not against quality opposition??Comment
-
Comment
Comment