Originally posted by Carlsson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bernard Hopkins; The Executioner??
Collapse
-
-
i like the way nobody responded too my post
a guy looks bad after hopkins-its because bhop 'took their souls'
a guy looks bad after losing too calzaghe-they are over-hyped calzaghe is **** his resume is **** etc etc
explain these double-standards too me someone?
Comment
-
Originally posted by british_fan View Posti like the way nobody responded too my post
a guy looks bad after hopkins-its because bhop 'took their souls'
a guy looks bad after losing too calzaghe-they are over-hyped calzaghe is **** his resume is **** etc etc
explain these double-standards too me someone?
I like Joe... as i said earlier, hes an entertaining fighter and and(it seems) a nice person, more than i can say about Hopkins.
A question for you British fan(i take it your british), what is the british peoples take on the Calzaghe-Hopkins fight??
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carlsson View Posti cannot, nor will i try since i have been defending calzaghe throughout this thread...
I like Joe... as i said earlier, hes an entertaining fighter and and(it seems) a nice person, more than i can say about Hopkins.
A question for you British fan(i take it your british), what is the british peoples take on the Calzaghe-Hopkins fight??
too be honest most of the guys i know are just casual fans,and all they saw was a guy clinching calzaghe for 12 rounds and not much else
i realize it is one of calzaghes best wins,which is a shame,calzaghe should have left frank warren a long long time ago,he is such a bad promoter
Comment
-
Originally posted by DiegoFuego View Postit's one of the worst nicknames in boxing. He never even hurts his opponents much less "executes" them. It's like calling Malignaggi "Iron Hands" or Margarito "The Flash." Hopkins is as far from an executioner as you can possibly get.
However, some people in this read have been making some fairly good arguments(not the one who said it was beacause he executed gameplans lol), saying he was more of an executioner in his physical prime i the late 90`s to early 00`s. They are probably right, however i think it would be a more appropriate nickname for a guy like Duran og a prime Tyson(hence my question;who`s the real Executioner of boxing)
but thanks for the laugh, i had the same opinion when makin this thread...
Comment
-
Originally posted by british_fan View Posttoo be honest most of the guys i know are just casual fans,and all they saw was a guy clinching calzaghe for 12 rounds and not much else
i realize it is one of calzaghes best wins,which is a shame,calzaghe should have left frank warren a long long time ago,he is such a bad promoter
well they are not entirely right, Hopkins did land some good shots.
Im fine with Calzaghe winning but it was a close fight. But i can understand why the casual fan would see it that way.
Another question, hope youve got the time?:
Being british, and a boxing fan, what is your take on the fight??
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carlsson View Postno he didnt...
not on the scorecards and not i my opinion.
He tried, but not in a very executioner style way if you ask me. The way i see it, a boxer who calls himself the executioner would not be using excesive holding og headbutts like he did in that fight... nor try to gain extra time from a low blow that obviously did not hurt that much... renember, Calzaghe cant punch
Comment
Comment