You're logic is to take everything out of context without mentioning the reasoning behind what happened to favor your argument.
You forgot to mention that DLH/Mayweather was marketed as "The fight to save boxing" from both the DLH camp and Mayweather camp. You forgot to mention that this fight came during a period where boxing was in stale state providing nothing for the casual fans. You forgot to mention that this fight introduced the 24/7 series for the first time giving casual fans a cinematic glimpse at what goes on behinds the scenes with dramatic music and clever and artistic editing.
How was it not going to do 2.5 mill after that? Of course it will fail to replicate the same kind of numbers after the first installment. Its incredibly difficult to keep something fresh especially when there are repeating elements.
But go ahead. Keep posting stats and what not. I'm sure it must be frustrating to have a perspective thats in the minority and of no true consequence.
You forgot to mention that DLH/Mayweather was marketed as "The fight to save boxing" from both the DLH camp and Mayweather camp. You forgot to mention that this fight came during a period where boxing was in stale state providing nothing for the casual fans. You forgot to mention that this fight introduced the 24/7 series for the first time giving casual fans a cinematic glimpse at what goes on behinds the scenes with dramatic music and clever and artistic editing.
How was it not going to do 2.5 mill after that? Of course it will fail to replicate the same kind of numbers after the first installment. Its incredibly difficult to keep something fresh especially when there are repeating elements.
But go ahead. Keep posting stats and what not. I'm sure it must be frustrating to have a perspective thats in the minority and of no true consequence.
Comment