mayweather has a better resume than pacquiao.

[shadeyfizzle]

I think the reason is cause Mayweather is a far superior fighter than Pacquiao.....so it makes Pac's fights look more exciting....Mayweather is miles beyond any fighter than he has faced or that Manny has faced....

He will suffer the same fate as RJJ....

"they say i didnt fight nobody, I just make them look like nobody"

but look at how easy Mayweather made Marquez look like he never boxer a day in his life (AND DO NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT WEIGHT)....weight doesnt enhance, Brain IQ, defense or skills.....

Fact is...just last year Marquez fought a bac and forth war with Pac, with Marquez landing more punches than Pac.......a year later...Mayweather fights him and doesnt get touched.....

that shows you the superiority of skill....nothing against Pac at all....But Mayweather is just a BETTER fighter with a much more versatile skillset which is why people say he hasnt fought anyone.....or hasnt been challenged..

let me ask you this...do you think the Pacquiao from 2001 that fought Lehlohonolo Ledwaba would beat the Diego Corrales from 2001 that Mayweather fought?

That's because Floyd fought in his comfort zone as a counterpuncher While Marquez looked like a fish out of water being forced to press the action. We all know Marquez is not an offensive fighter. And yet he was forced to be on the offensive the whole fight against Mayweather.

They say Mayweather carried Marquez when he could have finished him. I say bull****. Mayweather didnt want to go on the offensve and put Marquez back in his comfort zone and allow him to counterpunch his way back into the fight. He never went for the knockout and forced Marquez to press the fight.

[RightCross94]

That's because Floyd fought in his comfort zone as a counterpuncher While Marquez looked like a fish out of water being forced to press the action. We all know Marquez is not an offensive fighter. And yet he was forced to be on the offensive the whole fight against Mayweather.

They say Mayweather carried Marquez when he could have finished him. I say bull****. Mayweather didnt want to go on the offensve and put Marquez back in his comfort zone and allow him to counterpunch his way back into the fight. He never went for the knockout and forced Marquez to press the fight.

Well obviously. It's called a gameplan.

[gqjohnb]

ill give you the benefit of the doubt and say you are high..................thats why you knew floyd vs the big show had to be made and floyd vs sharmba mitshell had to be made

these are the guys who get green k on here... the one's who type in random incoherent **** instead making a valid argument like some of the other guys who have responded to my posts. lol

[shadeyfizzle]

Well obviously. It's called a gameplan.

I know that. And there aint nothin wrong with it. But dude was talkin about Floyd being more versatile than Marquez. I didnt see no versatility. Floyd fought off his backfoot like he always does while Marquez was forced to attack. Something he is not used to and has no clue how to do.

[Jiddu Dali]

That's because Floyd fought in his comfort zone as a counterpuncher While Marquez looked like a fish out of water being forced to press the action. We all know Marquez is not an offensive fighter. And yet he was forced to be on the offensive the whole fight against Mayweather.

They say Mayweather carried Marquez when he could have finished him. I say bull****. Mayweather didnt want to go on the offensve and put Marquez back in his comfort zone and allow him to counterpunch his way back into the fight. He never went for the knockout and forced Marquez to press the fight.

this alone is the reason why Mayweather is a better fighter than Pac...and a smarter fighter...mayweather takes away his opponents best weapon...this is war..not Patty cake...its about strategy......the fact that one of the best counterpunchers was totally taken out of his game plan and was turned into a fighter who presses just proves my point......

[El Jesus]

at the moment no. but a win over pac would, in my opinion, restore his dominance.

[Jiddu Dali]

I know that. And there aint nothin wrong with it. But dude was talkin about Floyd being more versatile than Marquez. I didnt see no versatility. Floyd fought off his backfoot like he always does while Marquez was forced to attack. Something he is not used to and has no clue how to do.

excuses...excuses....

boxing is not just throwing a lot of punches.....

Mayweather knew Marquez was a great counter puncher...its evident in the 2 Pac fights....so Mayweather took away his best weapon and slapped him around......

and for the record Mayweather is a more versatile fighter than Marquez is...its not even close....

[Lineal Champ]

I have a feeling TS and some other posters are less than 21 years old...

[El Jesus]

I know that. And there aint nothin wrong with it. But dude was talkin about Floyd being more versatile than Marquez. I didnt see no versatility. Floyd fought off his backfoot like he always does while Marquez was forced to attack. Something he is not used to and has no clue how to do.

I dont know if you are saying this to draw a knee jerk reaction of if you are just making things up for the sake of it. If the argument is weather or not floyd is more versatile than marquez, thats an obvious yes. That shouldnt even be something anyone should have to justify. Again, this is post actually for real? Or is this another one of youre "analysis".

[Kevin Jesus]

repostttttttttt