Tweet
Lets get some more results..
-
-
advantage or not... all the catchweight fights were a done deal...
half of the blame for the ****** heavier guy for agreeing to fight in a lower weight he, who *****s or ****** boxing analysts-fans say, is not comfortable with.
half of the blame for the wise coach setting the catchweight.Comment
-
LOL well as long as we agree that catchweights are lame. To me you deserve to get beaten for being ****** enough to agree to drain yourself.
But if we are going to agree that any thing can be requested in contracts....then why not OST?
See how pac fans contradict themselves.Comment
-
catchweights are fine but leave the belts out of it because thats bullcrapComment
-
I beleive like im sure many do that boxing needs to be sorted out and have one set of rules controled by one governing body!! i mean all floyd and pac **** aside the PED testing needs to be of the same standard of any sport to this level, even tennis players take stricter tests and they dont beat the crap outa one another.. someone take control!Comment
-
Fights like JCC and Sweat Pea would have never have happened without a catchweight.Comment
-
Great Shark, please name some of the catchweight fights throughout boxing history which you think were worthwhile. Example; Gans. vs. Walcott back in 1904. Was that fight worth making?
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3Comment
-
^^^ If that's too old for you, how about Pavlik vs. Hopkins.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3Comment
Comment