The ring ww ratings "whos on top?"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dknight
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 78
    • 1
    • 0
    • 6,107

    #41
    Originally posted by Bhopreign
    How do I know? The same way you know, we just do. Manny beat Cotto at 145, not at his best.
    Maybe not at his best, there should should be no excuses for Cotto losing. I hate to say it once more, but it was a winnable fight for Miguel. He blew it. Manny came in prepared ready for war and was the better fighter that night.

    Comment

    • alexpz
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 24237
      • 302
      • 245
      • 32,138

      #42
      Originally posted by Bhopreign
      Then why make the fight at 145?
      Then did Miguel sign the contract then?

      Comment

      • Bhopreign
        Banned
        • Jun 2006
        • 11273
        • 419
        • 100
        • 12,036

        #43
        Originally posted by alexpz
        Then did Miguel sign the contract then?
        Then why complain about Mayweather/Marquez.

        Comment

        • Bhopreign
          Banned
          • Jun 2006
          • 11273
          • 419
          • 100
          • 12,036

          #44
          Originally posted by Dknight
          Maybe not at his best, there should should be no excuses for Cotto losing. I hate to say it once more, but it was a winnable fight for Miguel. He blew it. Manny came in prepared ready for war and was the better fighter that night.
          Perhaps a better fight a year and a half ago, even Roach said Cotto is damaged goods.

          Comment

          • Jim Jeffries
            rugged individualist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 20741
            • 1,376
            • 2,868
            • 54,838

            #45
            Originally posted by Bhopreign
            Then why complain about Mayweather/Marquez.

            Maybe because Mayweather didn't even bother making weight?:thinking1:

            Comment

            • Bhopreign
              Banned
              • Jun 2006
              • 11273
              • 419
              • 100
              • 12,036

              #46
              Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
              Maybe because Mayweather didn't even bother making weight?:thinking1:
              Wrong hater, you complained when the fight was signed.

              Comment

              • chinoy
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 1104
                • 326
                • 350
                • 7,909

                #47
                dont get too sensitive......maybe Bhop could reign supreme again after beating RJJ

                Originally posted by Bhopreign
                Wrong hater, you complained when the fight was signed.

                Comment

                • Bhopreign
                  Banned
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 11273
                  • 419
                  • 100
                  • 12,036

                  #48
                  Originally posted by chinoy
                  dont get too sensitive......maybe Bhop could reign supreme again after beating RJJ
                  Im not sure Hopkins wins that fight.

                  Comment

                  • JulVal
                    Pound 4 Pound
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 500
                    • 58
                    • 41
                    • 8,487

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Bhopreign
                    I was talking about Williams at 154.
                    Am I saying that Pac is there just because he's achieved a lot more?
                    There are many factors on these kinds of decisions, it's not just about who will beat who, #1 loses too. If it won't then what kind of a crap list is that? All I'm saying is that you have to take everything in consideration when you rank.

                    FMJ didn't accomplish anything yet to get to #3 but skill-wise, no one can argue about his greatness. That's why he's number 3.

                    Quit being a ***** and give credit on where it is due. You're no boxing fan otherwise, but would only be called a nuthugging ******* like other people here who left when Cotto lost.

                    Comment

                    • Bhopreign
                      Banned
                      • Jun 2006
                      • 11273
                      • 419
                      • 100
                      • 12,036

                      #50
                      Originally posted by JulVal
                      Am I saying that Pac is there just because he's achieved a lot more?
                      There are many factors on these kinds of decisions, it's not just about who will beat who, #1 loses too. If it won't then what kind of a crap list is that? All I'm saying is that you have to take everything in consideration when you rank.

                      FMJ didn't accomplish anything yet to get to #3 but skill-wise, no one can argue about his greatness. That's why he's number 3.

                      Quit being a ***** and give credit on where it is due. You're no boxing fan otherwise, but would only be called a nuthugging ******* like other people here who left when Cotto lost.
                      First of all Pac has only had one fight at 147 and that was a drained Oscar.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP