The ring ww ratings "whos on top?"
Collapse
-
Perhaps a better fight a year and a half ago, even Roach said Cotto is damaged goods.Comment
-
Comment
-
Am I saying that Pac is there just because he's achieved a lot more?
There are many factors on these kinds of decisions, it's not just about who will beat who, #1 loses too. If it won't then what kind of a crap list is that? All I'm saying is that you have to take everything in consideration when you rank.
FMJ didn't accomplish anything yet to get to #3 but skill-wise, no one can argue about his greatness. That's why he's number 3.
Quit being a ***** and give credit on where it is due. You're no boxing fan otherwise, but would only be called a nuthugging ******* like other people here who left when Cotto lost.Comment
-
Am I saying that Pac is there just because he's achieved a lot more?
There are many factors on these kinds of decisions, it's not just about who will beat who, #1 loses too. If it won't then what kind of a crap list is that? All I'm saying is that you have to take everything in consideration when you rank.
FMJ didn't accomplish anything yet to get to #3 but skill-wise, no one can argue about his greatness. That's why he's number 3.
Quit being a ***** and give credit on where it is due. You're no boxing fan otherwise, but would only be called a nuthugging ******* like other people here who left when Cotto lost.Comment
Comment