The ring ww ratings "whos on top?"
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Shouldn't take their rankings that seriously. It's just how they see it, but not a fact. Everyone has their own list. I don't think making a debut with a crushing victory still justifies making a first appearance at #1 though. Being ranked 1st in a weight division says a lot about that fighter, and I don't think we can't make a case for Manny with just one fight, especially without one at 147lbs yet.Comment
-
Glad you copied him because he's blocked and I cant see his posts and he's wrong. Rankings are theoretically based on who they think would beat whoever is below them. Floyd was number 2 after beating a lightweight Marquez, fact of the matter is Floyd would have been number 2 if he only announced his unretirement, it had nothing to do with beating Marquez. This is what makes this site so poor, lack of knowledge.Comment
-
-
I dont get it. It says Pacquiao's got the WBO AND ring championship. But the 147lb champion spot is vacant.Comment
-
Glad you copied him because he's blocked and I cant see his posts and he's wrong. Rankings are theoretically based on who they think would beat whoever is below them. Floyd was number 2 after beating a lightweight Marquez, fact of the matter is Floyd would have been number 2 if he only announced his unretirement, it had nothing to do with beating Marquez. This is what makes this site so poor, lack of knowledge.Comment
-
Comment
-
Logged out to see resistant made another error filled post. If rankings were based on real results Pac wouldnt be ahead of Shane because he hasnt beaten him. I know how this goes, making up things wont change how rankings really come about. Ring is bias, very bias, I dont take them serious anymore and neither should anyone with some knowledge of the sport.Comment
Comment