Originally posted by Horus
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Horus View PostWhy didnt all the boxing experts rank Pacquiao higher than Mayweather
in
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
If Pacquiao had the better resume from begining to end?
Pacquiao resume is not better than Floyd's from top to bottom ..because if it was Pacquiao wouldnt have recently just got on the Pound for Pound list in 2004..when he has been a pro just 1995..
Floyd was Ranked on Ring Magazine's pound-for-pound list for
TEN consecutive years. 10 years.
Pacquiao was has only been on there half of that time.
Floyd has spent Three and a half Years Atop of that List: 2005,2006,2007, End Jun/2008 (retire)
1. 2005: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2005
2. 2006: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2006
3. 2007: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2007
Pacquiao has only spent 1 year ontop of that list..
2008:http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2008
FACTS dont support Pacquiao having a better overall resume from begining to end ...!!
FACTS or history dont support pacquiao. Only opinion!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Postok finally get an answer....ok now...step # 2.... other than MAB, & EM (wont say hatton, dlh or Marquez because Mayweather beat them as well) what other NAMES are on Pac's resume?
Sorry, my work is done here.
You, Horus and Kevin can continue your :wank: jerk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Flores View Post
You don't like your own questions, in your own threads?
you are unable to name more than 3 names on a 56 fight resume....
its not rocket science.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Horus View PostTHREAD OVER !
FACTS or history dont support pacquiao. Only opinion!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Flores View Post
Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?
Let's look at Pacquiao First 25 fights Compared to Mayweather first 25 fights
To see who has more recognizable names !!!
Do that for the whole resume. LMAO!!! you are a clown fa real.
Mayweather > Pacquiao in resume and name recognition
If you disagree...
ANSWER THIS QUESTION !!
Why is it that when both Pacquiao and Mayweather was active nobody rated Pacquiao higher than Mayweather, if Pacquiao suppose to have the better resume?
Dont you think People would have took note of this and had Manny Pacquiao
ranked higher then Floyd Mayweather.
in 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007, and 2008.?
Why in all these years did nobody ever say you know Floyd Mayweather,
your #2 and Manny pacquiao is #1 ?
Why?
FACTS = The cure for ignorance !
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Postactually what he said makes sense...If Pac has beat better fighters than Mayweather throughout his career..then why does it take Mayweather to retire for Pac to sniff the top p4P spot?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Horus View PostTHREAD OVER !
FACTS or history dont support pacquiao. Only opinion!
Floyd gets by on mythical, theoretical talent that he never wants to use in real fights.
Packy's the truth. Floyd is an unfulfilled promise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Postim not concerned with the ANSWER...i want the reasoning behind the answer..and you are unable to do that...
you are unable to name more than 3 names on a 56 fight resume....
its not rocket science.....
Comment
Comment