Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Moe Howard View Post
    He's always fought smaller, older, past it fighters. He's a fraud, but apparently a good one, cuz' he's fooled a couple of idiots on this site.

    He was matched tough once against a prime guy in Castillo and didn't like the asswhooping gave him and he said "never again"...Bring me the Baldomirs of the world!!!

    :wank:
    LMAO...and other than MAB, JMM & EM what other names do you recognize on Pac's resume?

    How can you as a fan justify his first 35 pro fights across Asia, getting KO'ed in 2 of them and fighting nobodies?...

    i dont get it

    Comment


    • Why didnt all the boxing experts rank Pacquiao higher than Mayweather
      in
      1998
      1999
      2000
      2001
      2002
      2003
      2004
      2005
      2006
      2007
      2008
      If Pacquiao had the better resume from begining to end?


      Pacquiao resume is not better than Floyd's from top to bottom ..because if it was Pacquiao wouldnt have recently just got on the Pound for Pound list in 2004..when he has been a pro just 1995..

      Floyd was Ranked on Ring Magazine's pound-for-pound list for
      TEN consecutive years. 10 years.

      Pacquiao was has only been on there half of that time.

      Floyd has spent Three and a half Years Atop of that List: 2005,2006,2007, End Jun/2008 (retire)
      1. 2005: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2005
      2. 2006: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2006
      3. 2007: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2007

      Pacquiao has only spent 1 year ontop of that list..
      2008:http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2008




      FACTS
      dont support Pacquiao having a better overall resume from begining to end ...!!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Post
        and u have yet to answer the question...

        WHO HAS FOUGHT MORE CHAMPS?


        also..ur in the high desert?..Palmdale?

        Sure I'll answer the question,


        " Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?"
        I, just as the rest of the logical posters here,

        voted Manny.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Moe Howard View Post
          Floyd is bigger than Hatton and the same size as Oscar. He was supposed to win those.

          Packy is a naturally smaller man who is OVER achieving. Thats much more impressive than a naturally bigger guy who UNDER achieves against smaller, older, less talented guys.

          Floyd did it to himself.
          Lol Dap, stop making a fool out of yourself.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Tom Flores View Post

            Gracias Oscar, you helped boxing continue to be the best sport in the world.
            Word. Oscar could give a **** about a loss, fought the best and gave us good fights.

            Comment


            • Tua, you're an honest poster on here, why don't you tell Dap that Oscar and Floyd were not the same size when they fought, please.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Horus View Post
                Why didnt all the boxing experts rank Pacquiao higher than Mayweather
                in
                1998
                1999
                2000
                2001
                2002
                2003
                2004
                2005
                2006
                2007
                2008
                If Pacquiao had the better resume from begining to end?


                Pacquiao resume is not better than Floyd's from top to bottom ..because if it was Pacquiao wouldnt have recently just got on the Pound for Pound list in 2004..when he has been a pro just 1995..

                Floyd was Ranked on Ring Magazine's pound-for-pound list for
                TEN consecutive years. 10 years.

                Pacquiao was has only been on there half of that time.

                Floyd has spent Three and a half Years Atop of that List: 2005,2006,2007, End Jun/2008 (retire)
                1. 2005: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2005
                2. 2006: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2006
                3. 2007: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2007

                Pacquiao has only spent 1 year ontop of that list..
                2008:http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2008




                FACTS
                dont support Pacquiao having a better overall resume from begining to end ...!!


                Figures it takes an uneducated hood rat to get the question mixed up.



                Here, try this, its what the thread is about.

                Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Moe Howard View Post
                  He's always fought smaller, older, past it fighters. He's a fraud, but apparently a good one, cuz' he's fooled a couple of idiots on this site.

                  He was matched tough once against a prime guy in Castillo and didn't like the asswhooping gave him and he said "never again"...Bring me the Baldomirs of the world!!!

                  :wank:
                  FAIL!!!,...that statement alone lets me know u dont know anything about boxing.....as i recall 5 months later Mayweather beat Castillo in a rematch....

                  I guess Castillo gave him such an ass whooping the first time that he wanted it again 5 months later?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Tom Flores View Post

                    Sure I'll answer the question,



                    I, just as the rest of the logical posters here,

                    voted Manny.
                    Read what Horus posted above you

                    Comment




                    • Floyd shoulda fought him first so that Pac's (potential) win wouldn't count.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP