Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?
Collapse
-
-
Why didnt all the boxing experts rank Pacquiao higher than Mayweather
in
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
If Pacquiao had the better resume from begining to end?
Pacquiao resume is not better than Floyd's from top to bottom ..because if it was Pacquiao wouldnt have recently just got on the Pound for Pound list in 2004..when he has been a pro just 1995..
Floyd was Ranked on Ring Magazine's pound-for-pound list for
TEN consecutive years. 10 years.
Pacquiao was has only been on there half of that time.
Floyd has spent Three and a half Years Atop of that List: 2005,2006,2007, End Jun/2008 (retire)
1. 2005: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2005
2. 2006: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2006
3. 2007: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2007
Pacquiao has only spent 1 year ontop of that list..
2008:http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2008
FACTS dont support Pacquiao having a better overall resume from begining to end ...!!Comment
-
Comment
-
Lol Dap, stop making a fool out of yourself.Floyd is bigger than Hatton and the same size as Oscar. He was supposed to win those.
Packy is a naturally smaller man who is OVER achieving. Thats much more impressive than a naturally bigger guy who UNDER achieves against smaller, older, less talented guys.
Floyd did it to himself.Comment
-
Comment
-
Tua, you're an honest poster on here, why don't you tell Dap that Oscar and Floyd were not the same size when they fought, please.Comment
-
Why didnt all the boxing experts rank Pacquiao higher than Mayweather
in
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
If Pacquiao had the better resume from begining to end?
Pacquiao resume is not better than Floyd's from top to bottom ..because if it was Pacquiao wouldnt have recently just got on the Pound for Pound list in 2004..when he has been a pro just 1995..
Floyd was Ranked on Ring Magazine's pound-for-pound list for
TEN consecutive years. 10 years.
Pacquiao was has only been on there half of that time.
Floyd has spent Three and a half Years Atop of that List: 2005,2006,2007, End Jun/2008 (retire)
1. 2005: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2005
2. 2006: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2006
3. 2007: http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2007
Pacquiao has only spent 1 year ontop of that list..
2008:http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph..._Ratings:_2008
FACTS dont support Pacquiao having a better overall resume from begining to end ...!!
Figures it takes an uneducated hood rat to get the question mixed up.
Here, try this, its what the thread is about.
Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?Comment
-
FAIL!!!,...that statement alone lets me know u dont know anything about boxing.....as i recall 5 months later Mayweather beat Castillo in a rematch....He's always fought smaller, older, past it fighters. He's a fraud, but apparently a good one, cuz' he's fooled a couple of idiots on this site.
He was matched tough once against a prime guy in Castillo and didn't like the asswhooping gave him and he said "never again"...Bring me the Baldomirs of the world!!!
:wank:
I guess Castillo gave him such an ass whooping the first time that he wanted it again 5 months later?
Comment
-
Comment
-

Comment