What a laughable argument....Floyd was a U.S Olympian they always get more attention in the U.S even if they do next to nothing really like Ward for ex. Also take into account that not many ppl pay attention to obscure foreign fighters in the very low weight classes. Pac gained more mainstream recognition later because he worked his way up out of nowhere Floyd already had the Mayweather name in addition to the Olympian status to shine light on him......Fact: Cotto alone will be a better opponent on Pac's resume than anyone Floyd has ever faced.....yeah, yeah I know.....you mean Cotto with 1 LOSS!!!!!?
Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?
Collapse
-
-
my question remains the same....
WHO HAS MORE NAMES ON THEIR RESUME...
we've established JMM, Hatton, & Oscar (they have both beat them)
now we have Pac with just MAB, & EM....and ur telling me Pac has MORE recognizable names than PBF?...
WOWComment
-
Comment
-
Jiddu Thread over my dude. Now they are making excuses. Instead of Provide names and Providing FACTS.lmao!!
he beat the #2 P4P fighter in the world (the same fighter than many people feel beat Pac just last year)
and Marquez only had to gain 7 lbs (coming up from 135)...that nothing compared to the 17 Manny had to put on to fight Oscar
and also thats pretty Pathetic if the UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED POUND FOR POUND #2 FIGHTER IN THE WORLD gets dominated and shut out by a guy who was inactive for almost 2 years!
Funny how people can not argue against facts.
Next time people want to argue Resumes....
Just bring up
Why didnt all the boxing experts rank Pacquiao higher than Mayweather
in
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
If Pacquiao had the better resume from begining to end?
The question is Plain and simple. But the answers always get Complicated .Comment
-
Comment
-
Castillo has a great resume at lw and beat a lotta good fighters there.
Plus the fight w/ Corrales is arguably the best fight of all time.
Thats enough for the HOF and ATG status.Comment
-
Comment
-
All they provide is opinions, it's useless trying to make a debate like this with them. Thread was over before it even started.Jiddu Thread over my dude. Now they are making excuses. Instead of Provide names and Providing FACTS.
Funny how people can not argue against facts.
Next time people want to argue Resumes....
Just bring up
Why didnt all the boxing experts rank Pacquiao higher than Mayweather
in
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
If Pacquiao had the better resume from begining to end?
The question is Plain and simple. But the answers always get Complicated .Comment

Comment