I love it how PRs are like Mexican is just hating on us boricuas and is ****** and blah, blah, blah, seriously, all he said if he loses, we all agree its no big deal if he loses competitively but like I said, if he gets KO'd early...or hell even in the 1st....Cotto should retire, Cotto has had a longer training camp, is the bigger/stronger fighter, is the "Top WW" right now, so he better win, no excuses and for the PRs that just love to bring up the plaster, yes that cheating **** did cheat against him, but how come Clottey, Williams and Santos were able to withstand the plaster and not Cotto? OR let me guess it was just in the Cotto fight?
lol I love it when cotto stans try and prove me wrong... .
I have not tried, I've done it and you always help just look at you response below
Originally posted by Pullcounter
you need to read my posts a little more closely... there is no incongruency or incoherency in my thought process.
I've said it before and I've said it again and again and again...
SCENARIO #1: If Cotto imposes his size advantage he should win under 6 rounds,
SCENARIO #2: HOWEVER if he doesn't hurt pac badly by then or hasn't KOed pac, then cotto will get beat up because cotto will gas and pac only gets stronger.
SCENARIO #3: BUT if cotto tries to get cute w/ pac by boxing and counterpunching, in other words if cotto waits on pac, pac speed will be too much for cotto and cotto will get sliced up.
I personally believe that scenario #1 will happen, but if cotto doesn't follow "the gameplan" and tries some ****** **** thinking he can hang with pac's speed, he will get beat up.
comprende?
Lols...
1) I don't give a ****... you guys think I'm some kinda hater... I'm not. In fact I defend cotto a lot! especially when people say cotto is shot or ruined because of the margo fight. I also am very vehement that cotto simply fought the wrong fight against margo and can win the rematch if he implements a few adjustments. I also am very forceful in believing that cotto beat clottey where a hater would say cotto lost that fight. So which is it? Am I a hater or am I a hugger or am I actually the only impartial mutha****er on these boards?
2) that's what I'm talking about... you cotto stans are too emotional... you don't think with your brain, you feel with your heart. If a cotto stan admitted that cotto is not invincible and that plainly acknowledged cotto's weaknesses, I would say that stan is thinking with his brain.
Just look at your post above on which you present 3 scenarios, 2 of which are in Pacman's favor. So in your own words and scenarios Pacman has better chance to beat Cotto but Cotto should retire and is a shame if he loses. WTF!!!!
I dont give a **** either if you like Cotto or not, my response to you has been always in regards to your former 106 lbs statment ind of dicrediting any acheivement that Cotto might have in victory and conveniently forget that Cotto was a former 106 lber also, and the fact that you say that Cotto will be a shame if he loses to a guy that even you have posted here can and will beat Cotto and then turn around another day a say that Cotto is to big.
THAT WHAT I CALL PATHETIC AND I DID NOT HAVE TO PROVE IT AGAIN, YOU DID ON YOUR OWN!!!
you guys get too caught up in the number "106"... all that symbolizes is that pac doesn't belong at WW... it's called hyperbole... and the purpose of hyperbole is to shock and get a reaction...
hence the number "106" is effective and hence I will continue to use it.
This is were you are pathetic with the 106 lber statement.
Curious how you say that WE get caught up in the 106 number when it is YOU who always brings it up.
In the 90's Cotto was a 106lber also why you choose to use your so called "hyperbole" to describe Cotto also. How convenient!!! And then you come here almost begging for us to beleive you, saying that you don't have a agenda against Cotto. Good luck with that!!! Your double standards to view the fighters makes you lose your credibility.
Originally posted by Pullcounter
notice he didn't reply to my response.
I had not responded because I was offline. I don't know you, but i work for a living, however there have been plenty of posters that have noticed how you have not responded to several of our post.
Originally posted by Pullcounter
if cotto loses to a smaller man at his weight division, that means he should retire because there are more dangerous opponents at 147 lbs than a midget who used to be a former 106 lber.
Cotto has already fought the most dangerous WW at 147 besides PBF and has had good results besides Margarito which has an * next to the lost and proved that he can beat him also, just didn't have a good 2nd have of the fight probably because of side effect of possible plaster, so what oponents are you talking about!!!!
I cant believe am hearing this coming out of the mouth of a mexican. Well screw him and that cheater margarito. This ****** is just mad because he s picking apples some where
You're pretty good at racism. Now learn how to spell boxing, douche.
PAC has good leg speed & cotto might mentally be dmged other than that PAC has nottin on cotto.
If cotto is not mentally dmged, than there is no way PAC is better than him not in any weight class, shape or form.
PAC only trows 2 punches that's it. That's not skills in my book
pac throws 2 punches??????? lol...
this the funniest post ive ever seen since september this year!!! lol
Comment