Double standards with Chad Dawson and Miguel Cotto.

[Clegg]

What a ****** post.

YOU are the one who has been obsessively complaining about Chad Dawson. You criticise him far more than anyone else on here, and now you're crying that people use double standards when calling him boring?

[Matt Marvelous]

I support Dawson against a lot of fighters, but he's boring as hell. More boring than Floyd because Floyd is a complete master in the ring. Chad is a level below in all aspects.

[¤¤¤]

dawson is on the move from the start. cotto moves when things are starting to get rough for him.

[Iceta]

What a ****** post.

YOU are the one who has been obsessively complaining about Chad Dawson. You criticise him far more than anyone else on here, and now you're crying that people use double standards when calling him boring?

I eased off my criticism of him though after he beat Johnson even though I stuck by my position that he's not a scintillating fighter. I'm just saying that Cotto ran even more against a smaller opponent, and people as of right now are praising him as a warrior. Now obviously Pacquiao is a better and fresher opponent than Johnson, but if you don't see those double standards then you are blind. And yeah. I'm saying this as one of the biggest Chad Dawson haters on this forum. And like I said, I actually get more excited about Cotto's fights. I'm just pointing out double standards that people use.

[Clegg]

I eased off my criticism of him though after he beat Johnson even though I stuck by my position that he's not a scintillating fighter. I'm just saying that Cotto ran even more against a smaller opponent, and people as of right now are praising him as a warrior. Now obviously Pacquiao is a better and fresher opponent than Johnson, but if you don't see those double standards then you are blind. And yeah. I'm saying this as one of the biggest Chad Dawson haters on this forum. And like I said, I actually get more excited about Cotto's fights. I'm just pointing out double standards that people use.

You don't understand because you are too biased and ****** to comprehend even a simplistic argument.

[IMDAZED]

I eased off my criticism of him though after he beat Johnson even though I stuck by my position that he's not a scintillating fighter. I'm just saying that Cotto ran even more against a smaller opponent, and people as of right now are praising him as a warrior. Now obviously Pacquiao is a better and fresher opponent than Johnson, but if you don't see those double standards then you are blind. And yeah. I'm saying this as one of the biggest Chad Dawson haters on this forum. And like I said, I actually get more excited about Cotto's fights. I'm just pointing out double standards that people use.

No you didn't, you created a thread on how boring he was.

[Iceta]

No you didn't, you created a thread on how boring he was.

That was before the fight though. I think I made a thread after the fight comparing his entertainment value with a guy like Paul Williams. But that's as far as I went.