Carl Froch: "Andre Dirrell Tried To Steal a Decision"

[Syf]

Dirrell refused to fight so Froch's frustration showed. What do you expect, the guy came for a fight, that's what he's paid to do and what he trained for hours to do only to be stuck in a ring chasing a guy who wants to do laps of a track instead of engaging

It shouldn't matter.

If one lets their own honor be compromised by the conduct of another, what substance does their honor really have?

Point blank, Froch had no answers for Dirrell's stay on the outside, then dart in with stinging hits, then dart out style.. So he resorted to fouling. Its simply what happened. Its only after things started getting dirty in there that Dirrell started clinching. His clinching was a RESPONSE to Froch's fouls, not vice versa.

Its okay though..I'm over it...most of us are over it. But it does not seem like Froch, and some of his fans, are.

[DonTaseMeBrah]

You have to be suffering from some kind of eye condition if you think froch won this fight.

[Fox McCloud]

Did anyone say he should do it? no. But his frustration showed, it's only natural. It's the same thing whenever Hatton punched a rope, Mayweather ran turned his back and jumped out of the ring so Hatton got frustrated.

You can't be a serious fight fan if you support these cowardly tactics and that's just the truth speaking.

Lol, Hitman bends Mayweather's head over (like he wanted to get in that ass), and then took a shot at the back of his head... yeah... no, I support that. I want to see more Gerald McClellans in the sport.

Thumbs up fight fan!

[Weebler I]

Point blank, Froch had no answers for Dirrell's stay on the outside, then dart in with stinging hits, then dart out style.. So he resorted to fouling. Its simply what happened. Its only after things started getting dirty in there that Dirrell started clinching. His clinching was a RESPONSE to Froch's fouls, not vice versa.

Ducking down, going to ground, holding on, running away constantly. This is the kind of thing you want to support in boxing?

Its okay though..I'm over it...most of us are over it. But it does not seem like Froch, and some of his fans, are.

If people are interviewing Froch to ask him what he thinks he's going to tell them what he thinks. It's nothing more than that, he won, he's still the (rightful) champion.

[S A M U R A I]

Dirrell refused to fight

Yet he outlanded Froch by a wide margin? You're not making sense. If he refused to fight, how come he landed so many clean, accurate, crisp combinations all night?



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[S A M U R A I]

Ducking down, going to ground, holding on, running away constantly. This is the kind of thing you want to support in boxing?

If it's a choice between that or rabbit punching and MMA moves, sure.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[JM1]

WBC super middleweight champion Carl Froch is claiming that Andre Dirrell fought in a certain manner to steal rounds and swerve the judges to win a decision. Froch won a close split decision over Dirrell last Saturday night in Nottingham, England. There has been a lot of controversy over which fighter deserved the decision. Froch says Dirrell was afraid of being hit and stayed on the run for the entire twelve rounds, making their contest very ugly. [details]

froch should know whats boxing

[Fox McCloud]

Ducking down, going to ground, holding on, running away constantly. This is the kind of thing you want to support in boxing?



If people are interviewing Froch to ask him what he thinks he's going to tell them what he thinks. It's nothing more than that, he won, he's still the (rightful) champion.

Lol, the only part of this I agree with is that Froch thinks he is still champion. It is natural for anyone who fought to think they win.

I do think it's ironic that the guy who was hurt (Froch) thought that guy who wasn't hurt (Dirrell) didn't bring a fight to him at all. Trust me, the last thing I was thinking was that light puncher Dirrell was going to hurt Froch who has an iron chin (at least that is what you UK people have been lying to me about). I was worried for this bout in case Dirrell got knocked out, since he has had chin issues in the past, and Froch is the hardest puncher to ever live (according to unbiased UK fight fans), so... it's a bit surprising.

[King Jaffe Joffer]

How ironic, He is the one who stole a decision

[Dan...]

To all those responding to Weebler:

When will you people learn? This man is a total fool and has provided evidence of it on countless occasions. Just ignore everything the moron says.