Canelo is not an all time great fighter

[IronDanHamza]

Yes you did

So you retract your statement

Show me where I said Pacquaio was on PEDs.

I haven't, because there is no evidence Pacquaio was on PEDs.

Now name 115 fighters with better resumes than Canelo. You know you can't

[djtmal]

. I doubt you could even name 115 boxers in general

Like how you was wrong about Hearns being in his prime, and Manny being on peds

[djtmal]

I haven't, because there is no evidence Pacquaio was on PEDs.

:

So you backtracking on that or is that what boxrec told you

[IronDanHamza]

Like how you was wrong about Hearns being in his prime, and Manny being on peds

So you're saying you're wrong and there aren't 115 better resumes?

You said being stopped eqautes to not being in their prime, so you said Hearns wasn't prime. That's your logic, not mine.

I never said Pacquaio was on PEDs, and if you think I did, for the 20th time, show me where I said it. Quote the post and # the post.

You're deflecting because you're getting battered from pillar to post.

[IronDanHamza]

So you backtracking on that or is that what boxrec told you

Backtracking on what?

Show me where I said that Pacquaio was on PEDs.

Quote or # the post.

[djtmal]

Backtracking on what?


.

On saying Manny was on peds

[djtmal]

You said being stopped eqautes to not being in their prime,

Where

What does that have to do with Canelo not being an all time great worth talking about

[IronDanHamza]

On saying Manny was on peds

Ok so what did I say that I'm backtracking on? Quote me.

[djtmal]

show me where I said it.

I did

[IronDanHamza]

Where

What does that have to do with Canelo not being an all time great worth talking about

Am I mistaken that you said someone that's been stopped isn't in their prime?

Your position isn't that if someone that's been stopped can still be in their prime?

Careful with your answer now.