Comments Thread For: Size and sighs: Terence Crawford provides yet more evidence that bigger does not equal better
Collapse
-
So long ago when I was a young g man, I was the same height as Mike Tyson but I could easily make 135 & even 130 at a push.
My point is that height/weight isn't automatically an advantage unless you make it your advantage. Play to your strengths and accommodate your weaknesses.
Look at Nick Ball, 5'2" and competing at feather. Knows how to use his (lack of) height to his advantage. Forces opponents to adjust to him rather than vica versa.
👍 1Comment
-
Yup and a few are admitting they were wrong but, they add a little jab to take away from Crawford's achievement such as Canelo lost a step, got old..more mileage etc.Then, some will demand that he fights Bivol or Benavidez if he really wants to chase greatness lol. Just more tears for my cup and I'll savor each and every single one of them.. slowly.
In addition, those fights are not worth anywhere near the risk and reward that a Canelo fight brought Terence. I can see Bud fighting only one more time and that is with Canelo. That's If he wants a shot at regaining his title belts again.
Then Bud would happily oblige him but from his own words; He won't be fighting at 154 again or at 175 ever. He just defeated the face of boxing for crying aloud!
There is no one left to fight who is a bigger cash cow or Draw than a Canelo.Comment
-
I think it indicates that styles make fights. Madrimov is an underrated, difficult styled fighter.Comment
-
Crawford is bigger, Canelo is heavier. Skill and long reach definitely help Crawford and what impressed me more he was never hurt, Great Chin.Comment
Comment