Canelo Alvarez Is On Steroids
Collapse
-
-
It is extremely uncommon. Less than 1% of professional boxers achieve it. Way less than 1% actually.
What you "think" is irrelevant, it's a fact.
The fact Reynoso fighters are rampant with PED use could be a reason to point to Canelo still being on PEDs. That's not an unreasonable view to have.Sure, a fighter having uncommon attributes wouldn't usually equate to him using PEDs in the pursuit of his goals.. However we are talking Reynoso here; a guy who famously gave Canelo a pill to take in full view of officials after stepping off the scales and a trainer who is responsible for five of his fighters failing PED tests. Canelo is a guy who will say one thing only to later back track later on. with that in mind you simply can't give them the benefit of the doubt in regards to PED use.
His height though you should just leave at the door because it's total none starter.Comment
-
If you're including extremely low level fighters and journeyman in that stat then of course it would be 1%, but why would you even want to consider them? A majority of them are fighting for financial reasons and don't actually have any ambition to win a title. For fighters within the top 20 sanctioning body rankings who have the means and want to do so it is almost certainly attainable.
It is extremely uncommon. Less than 1% of professional boxers achieve it. Way less than 1% actually.
What you "think" is irrelevant, it's a fact.
The fact Reynoso fighters are rampant with PED use could be a reason to point to Canelo still being on PEDs. That's not an unreasonable view to have.
His height though you should just leave at the door because it's total none starter.
Just out of interest what is your reasoning for there not being a mass of 5'7 fighters campaigning between 168lbs-175lbs, I'm intrigued.Comment
-
Well, if you give it quick re-read ol' boy I said professional boxers. So that means, news just in, professional boxers. Incase you're still not sure what that means, that means people that have a professional boxing license.
If you're including extremely low level fighters and journeyman in that stat then of course it would be 1%, but why would you even want to consider them? A majority of them are fighting for financial reasons and don't actually have any ambition to win a title. For fighters within the top 20 sanctioning body rankings who have the means and want to do so it is almost certainly attainable.
Amongst those, less than 1% of those win a World Title. Substantially less than that win World titles in 2 weight classes.
Do you know what sub 1% of something is deemed as? Extremely uncommon.
Did you go to school, or what? Or was your educational upbriging looking at a wall?
There could be a plethora or reasons.
Why did Qawi compete at at Crusierweight at 5 ft 5? There's a list of those examples.
Someone's height doesn't equate to PED use. Is there a way I can put that for an easier way for you to understand or are we going to be here all day?Comment
-
I can see you're clearly a bit special... Totally didn't address the point I made - why would you want to include low level fighters in the percentage of fighters who will win a title if they have no intention of fighting for one?? It's a completely meaningless stat you mong.
Well, if you give it quick re-read ol' boy I said professional boxers. So that means, news just in, professional boxers. Incase you're still not sure what that means, that means people that have a professional boxing license.
Amongst those, less than 1% of those win a World Title. Substantially less than that win World titles in 2 weight classes.
Do you know what sub 1% of something is deemed as? Extremely uncommon.
Did you go to school, or what? Or was your educational upbriging looking at a wall?
There could be a plethora or reasons.
Why did Qawi compete at at Crusierweight at 5 ft 5? There's a list of those examples.
Someone's height doesn't equate to PED use. Is there a way I can put that for an easier way for you to understand or are we going to be here all day?
So you're saying height doesn't equate to PED use but when pressed on why there's an extreme lack of short fighters at the higher weights can't offer any explanation other than referring to the only fighter everybody usually brings up in these discussions... Have you actually got anything relevant to contribute on this subject other than the fact that you took steroids for 30 years and now have bawlz the size of raisons?Comment
-
I addressed it directly, you stupid cunt
I can see you're clearly a bit special... Totally didn't address the point I made - why would you want to include low level fighters in the percentage of fighters who will win a title if they have no intention of fighting for one?? It's a completely meaningless stat you mong.
Less than 1% of professional boxers win world titles in two weight classes. That is an objective fact. Do you know that word, objective? It means it's not debatable.
That means it is extremely uncommon to do so. You are the one who denied that's the case, you moron.
Which part are you not getting there?
Right, that's correct. It's not.
Being 5'7 competing at 168 and 175 has no bearing on potential PED use.
Quite literally none.
I've luckily not suffered with testicular atrophy so that's a non issue there, even if I did though that's part of the game for the most part, you charge it to it like every other side effect from consistent PED use. Not sure why you've brought my balls into this topic for the second time. Kind of weird.but when pressed on why there's an extreme lack of short fighters at the higher weights can't offer any explanation other than referring to the only fighter everybody usually brings up in these discussions... Have you actually got anything relevant to contribute on this subject other than the fact that you took steroids for 30 years and now have bawlz the size of raisons?
I've already told you as clear as day. Being short and heavy at the same time not unique, and, doesn't point to PED use. You're seemingly struggling to grasp it because you're as dumb as a box of rocks.
Quit while you're behind, you look retarded.
Comment
-
So to conclude... you're a a special mong, who struggles with comprehension, who abused steroids for 30+ years, who suffers from roid rage and is in denial of his testicular atrophy... Nice attributes my guy
I addressed it directly, you stupid cunt
Less than 1% of professional boxers win world titles in two weight classes. That is an objective fact. Do you know that word, objective? It means it's not debatable.
That means it is extremely uncommon to do so. You are the one who denied that's the case, you moron.
Which part are you not getting there?
Right, that's correct. It's not.
Being 5'7 competing at 168 and 175 has no bearing on potential PED use.
Quite literally none.
I've luckily not suffered with testicular atrophy so that's a non issue there, even if I did though that's part of the game for the most part, you charge it to it like every other side effect from consistent PED use. Not sure why you've brought my balls into this topic for the second time. Kind of weird.
I've already told you as clear as day. Being short and heavy at the same time not unique, and, doesn't point to PED use. You're seemingly struggling to grasp it because you're as dumb as a box of rocks.
Quit while you're behind, you look retarded.
Comment
-
Not remotely in denial
Some people suffer worse than others with side effects from PED use and that's one I've luckily managed to avoid in severity. Others not so much. You'd know that if you had the first clue about this topic which you of course don't.
Not on roids any more, just TRT. So, no to the roid rage.
But in conclusion, you're clueless and made yourself look a right wolley in this thread
As said previously, I would strongly consider further revision before speaking on this topic again. It would avoid you looking like a total uniformed spastic as you've done here.Comment
-
Lil bro is just mad still cause the ginger whooped and retired his hero GGG, plain and simple.
But lets assume Canelo is on the juice,this would mean absolutely everybody is on the juice then and that would shatter the credibility of this beautiful sport. Why even bother watching it then lol. Whats the purpose of Vada, Wada and all those antidoping organizations if they not doing their job correctly and keeping the sport 'clean'.Last edited by A.B Counterhooks; 09-10-2025, 08:15 PM.Comment
-
Your roid rage has shown in this thread, you started throwing around insults when it wasn't necessary. I don't know much about steroids and take great pride in that. I mean what sort of an absolute melt do you have to be to take steroids for 30 years for your job... Most people are just happy to receive an income, you on the other hand mug your body off on a daily basis for your employment lool. And the damage has been done because now you have to take TRT just to feel like a normal man
Not remotely in denial
Some people suffer worse than others with side effects from PED use and that's one I've luckily managed to avoid in severity. Others not so much. You'd know that if you had the first clue about this topic which you of course don't.
Not on roids any more, just TRT. So, no to the roid rage.
But in conclusion, you're clueless and made yourself look a right wolley in this thread
As said previously, I would strongly consider further revision before speaking on this topic again. It would avoid you looking like a total uniformed spastic as you've done here.
You're definitely not one of life's winners are you?Comment
Comment