Desperate American heels

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Toffee
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2018
    • 7212
    • 2,492
    • 74
    • 62,824

    #11
    'Baddest' seems to sell in the US. Remember how many really thought Tyson would beat Lewis? Tyson was 'bad' and Lewis must be soft because he spoke fairly well and played chess.

    Better beats bad. The 'bad' is just theatre.

    Comment

    • PBR Streetgang
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2016
      • 8270
      • 3,910
      • 2,150
      • 42,787

      #12
      Originally posted by Coverdale

      Let's bring it back to boxing. Why can't more US fighters build a local following in the manner of say Hatton or Calzaghe?
      I'm not sure that the US has the same close-knit regional ties for guys to consistently pull in big numbers while staying at a certain level.

      Jose Ramirez, Vinny Pazienza, Terrence Crawford, Arturo Gatti could always count on filling out their local arenas.

      Comment

      • Coverdale
        Email champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Apr 2025
        • 990
        • 445
        • 667
        • 0

        #13
        Originally posted by PBR Streetgang

        I'm not sure that the US has the same close-knit regional ties for guys to consistently pull in big numbers while staying at a certain level.

        Jose Ramirez, Vinny Pazienza, Terrence Crawford, Arturo Gatti could always count on filling out their local arenas.
        Great answer, thank you. And what's interesting is that none of the names you mention behaved like heels.

        Kelly Pavlik had a good local following and wasn't a heel, also.

        Comment

        • MulaKO
          Zero F@cks Given
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 26497
          • 6,648
          • 6,039
          • 221,421

          #14
          Originally posted by PBR Streetgang

          I'm not sure that the US has the same close-knit regional ties for guys to consistently pull in big numbers while staying at a certain level.

          Jose Ramirez, Vinny Pazienza, Terrence Crawford, Arturo Gatti could always count on filling out their local arenas.
          Jermaine Taylor was another who comes to mind
          Little Rock Arkansas

          Comment

          • NihonJim
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Dec 2024
            • 770
            • 385
            • 91
            • 0

            #15
            Originally posted by Willow The Wisp
            Slippery slope, this thread.
            Personally, I'm very proud of where I come from, and grateful as well. But I am pretty well traveled and proud also to be an avowed citizen of the world; and I've witnessed first hand that no one people, culture or nation is superlative in every measure.

            The United States was a nation born from crushing the largest expeditionary force ever assembled by Great Britain at that time, and by the late 19th century supplanted her as the world's most powerful nation, both militarily and economically. Today, the U.S. hosts 4.22% of the world's population yet holds approximately 32% of the world's liquid, investable wealth, estimated at $67 trillion.

            It stands that these conditions are going to give both Americans and the British something of an attitude when conceptualizing each other.

            What you're more likely observing with these boxers, however, are behaviors relating to subcultures within the U.S.
            Funny I thought it was born on SLAVERY

            Comment

            • ShoulderRoll
              Join The Great Resist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 55975
              • 10,046
              • 5,025
              • 763,445

              #16
              UK fighters usually suck once they get to the world level, though. Let’s be honest. Heel or not.

              Comment

              • PBR Streetgang
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2016
                • 8270
                • 3,910
                • 2,150
                • 42,787

                #17
                Originally posted by Coverdale

                Great answer, thank you. And what's interesting is that none of the names you mention behaved like heels.

                Kelly Pavlik had a good local following and wasn't a heel, also.
                Don't forget that Money Mayweather started off as "Pretty Boy Floyd"....I think Floyd realized that playing the heel would generate revenue. It's not just boxing...look at MMA with guys like Chael and Conor.

                Comment

                • Nash out
                  BoxingScene Hall of Fame
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2018
                  • 5900
                  • 2,114
                  • 1,794
                  • 19,416

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Coverdale
                  Why does the United States produce more 'heel' characters in boxing than any other nation? British media will usually refer to 'the brash American', with brash being a polite way of saying 'obnoxious imbecile'. Berlanga is the latest one who follows Miller, Lopez, Broner and countless others.

                  Far from being a sign of confidence, it's quite obviously massive over compensation. It's not entertaining to me either, observing such characters usually makes for an embarrassing/uncomfortable experience.

                  Nor is it necessary to sell PPVs as some will no doubt imply. Ricky Hatton was a pretty dull character outside the ring but he did the hard graft of building a local following, fighting regularly and putting on good performances. He wasn't even an elite talent, just slightly below that.

                  At root, I view the American heel as desperate. Desperate to 'make it' by any means necessary, even at the cost of one's dignity. US culture, after all, gave us that appalling show Jackass.
                  What about Faces that turned and became a heel? Have there been many/any of those? Could ****e boxing up in a bit. Nash out - His Majesty

                  Comment

                  • TheIronMike
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2018
                    • 4169
                    • 1,263
                    • 779
                    • 17,589

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Coverdale
                    Why does the United States produce more 'heel' characters in boxing than any other nation? British media will usually refer to 'the brash American', with brash being a polite way of saying 'obnoxious imbecile'. Berlanga is the latest one who follows Miller, Lopez, Broner and countless others.

                    Far from being a sign of confidence, it's quite obviously massive over compensation. It's not entertaining to me either, observing such characters usually makes for an embarrassing/uncomfortable experience.

                    Nor is it necessary to sell PPVs as some will no doubt imply. Ricky Hatton was a pretty dull character outside the ring but he did the hard graft of building a local following, fighting regularly and putting on good performances. He wasn't even an elite talent, just slightly below that.

                    At root, I view the American heel as desperate. Desperate to 'make it' by any means necessary, even at the cost of one's dignity. US culture, after all, gave us that appalling show Jackass.
                    We call it American exceptionalism. It's why the UK was never able to recover its glory from before 1938.

                    Comment

                    • Coverdale
                      Email champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Apr 2025
                      • 990
                      • 445
                      • 667
                      • 0

                      #20
                      Originally posted by TheIronMike

                      We call it American exceptionalism. It's why the UK was never able to recover its glory from before 1938.
                      'American exceptionalism' was a term invented by foreign policy hawks to justify bombing and invading Third World countries. I am going to assume you don't support that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP