Why does the United States produce more 'heel' characters in boxing than any other nation? British media will usually refer to 'the brash American', with brash being a polite way of saying 'obnoxious imbecile'. Berlanga is the latest one who follows Miller, Lopez, Broner and countless others.
Far from being a sign of confidence, it's quite obviously massive over compensation. It's not entertaining to me either, observing such characters usually makes for an embarrassing/uncomfortable experience.
Nor is it necessary to sell PPVs as some will no doubt imply. Ricky Hatton was a pretty dull character outside the ring but he did the hard graft of building a local following, fighting regularly and putting on good performances. He wasn't even an elite talent, just slightly below that.
At root, I view the American heel as desperate. Desperate to 'make it' by any means necessary, even at the cost of one's dignity. US culture, after all, gave us that appalling show Jackass.
Far from being a sign of confidence, it's quite obviously massive over compensation. It's not entertaining to me either, observing such characters usually makes for an embarrassing/uncomfortable experience.
Nor is it necessary to sell PPVs as some will no doubt imply. Ricky Hatton was a pretty dull character outside the ring but he did the hard graft of building a local following, fighting regularly and putting on good performances. He wasn't even an elite talent, just slightly below that.
At root, I view the American heel as desperate. Desperate to 'make it' by any means necessary, even at the cost of one's dignity. US culture, after all, gave us that appalling show Jackass.
Comment