What was more of a robbery? Berto-Collazo or Froch-Dirrell

[Pullcounter]

your right none of that stuff should effect the outcome

but when it comes to in ring action .. Dirrell was holding and using a lot of movement

and in situations like that ^ Froch's pressure probably got him the benefit, as he's trying to make the fight, rather then spoil with holding + moving away

if Dirrell landed punches and it probably would have effected the scoring more in his favor.

as sure he was making Froch miss plenty at times

but in the same token one could say Dirrell was borderline running.

and when it comes down to the above

in the guys hometown the judges will be more likely to give the man who's making the fight

rather then the one playing keep away.

Crotch can't win if he can't land punches!

Dirrell got robbed.

[The Gambler1981]

I know what Dirrell did to make the fight closer then it should have been but what did Froch do to make it a close fight?

[Kevin Jesus]

I know what Dirrell did to make the fight closer then it should have been but what did Froch do to make it a close fight?

Be from Nottingham.

[-EX-]

Berto-Collazo was definently not a robbery...

[Bhopreign]

your right none of that stuff should effect the outcome

but when it comes to in ring action .. Dirrell was holding and using a lot of movement

and in situations like that ^ Froch's pressure probably got him the benefit, as he's trying to make the fight, rather then spoil with holding + moving away

if Dirrell landed punches and it probably would have effected the scoring more in his favor.

as sure he was making Froch miss plenty at times

but in the same token one could say Dirrell was borderline running.

and when it comes down to the above

in the guys hometown the judges will be more likely to give the man who's making the fight

rather then the one playing keep away.

But you have to LAND punches, which Froch didnt do. If you dont land punches you dont win, doesnt matter about pressure which he wasnt doing either. So many times Dirrell stood in Froch's face and Froch just stood there afraid to throw for fear of being countered. People say Floyd ran from Oscar, but so many times Floyd stood right in front of Oscar and Oscar didnt throw, for fear of being countered. Thats what counter punchers do, they counter to get you think about not throwing, that along with Froch missing and not landing, Id say mission accomplished.

[sylvestersweet]

I had Collazo winning by a point in the fight with Berto but that definitely could have gone either way.
Froch-Dirrell was definitely a Dirrell victory.

[MJ406]

Crotch can't win if he can't land punches!

Dirrell got robbed.

you act like Froch landed zero punches the entire fight

get real.

[¤¤¤]

Berto edged Collazo and that could have gone either way. Froch didn't win more then 3 rounds.

same here.

[MJ406]

But you have to LAND punches, which Froch didnt do. If you dont land punches you dont win, doesnt matter about pressure which he wasnt doing either. So many times Dirrell stood in Froch's face and Froch just stood there afraid to throw for fear of being countered. People say Floyd ran from Oscar, but so many times Floyd stood right in front of Oscar and Oscar didnt throw, for fear of being countered. Thats what counter punchers do, they counter to get you think about not throwing, that along with Froch missing and not landing, Id say mission accomplished.

If Dirrell was effectively counter punching the whole night he would have won the fight easily

he did a very good job of slipping and ducking from the punches .. but not enough counter punching.

[Pugilistic™]

Berto - Collazo was not a robbery, very close fight that i had Berto edging.

Froch - Dirrell was a robbery, Froch won no more than 3-4 rounds.