Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Log in
Or
Sign Up
Forgot password or user name?
Log in with
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Home
Forum
Boxing Forums
Non Stop Boxing
What was more of a robbery? Berto-Collazo or Froch-Dirrell
Collapse
Sign in or register here to comment
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Sign In / Register
Page
of
4
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
1
2
3
4
template
Next
Pullcounter
no guts no glory
Join Date:
Jan 2004
Posts:
42582
Received
549
Given
191
Points:
49,739
Share
Tweet
#31
10-18-2009, 07:26 PM
Originally posted by
MJ406
you act like Froch landed zero punches the entire fight
get real.
he didn't land zero, but he didn't land more than dirrell. and dirrell was the one who wobbled froch.
Comment
Post
Cancel
MJ406
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
Aug 2007
Posts:
4370
Received
61
Given
211
Points:
12,288
Share
Tweet
#32
10-18-2009, 07:29 PM
he wobbled him one time for christ sake.
and he probably won that round. except for the point deduction.
I'll view the fight again, but Dirrell should have been pot shotting much more .. it would have made his movement appear more along the lines of showing ring generalship.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Sign in or register here to comment
Previous
1
2
3
4
template
Next
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
😀
😂
🥰
😘
🤢
😎
😞
😡
👍
👎
☕
TOP
Sign In
USERNAME
PASSWORD
Forgot password?
Remember Me
SIGN IN
Register
Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
JOIN NOW
Comment