What was more of a robbery? Berto-Collazo or Froch-Dirrell

[STILL_DETOX]

[Kevin Jesus]

I called Collazo-Berto a robbery the first time around, second time when i actually scored i had Berto winning clearly.

I saw Froch-Dirrell 5 times and couldn't give Froch more than 3 rounds. Honestly...

[The Gambler1981]

Berto actually landed clean effective punches and came on later in the fight.

Carl Froch has a good looking girlfriend~

[..WaRSpencE..]

Berto Collazo IMO..

I had Collazo winning...and it was a UD and one judge even had it 116-111..SHAME!!..


Froch-Dirrell could've went either way IMO..but I also had Dirrell winning..but a SD sounds right but I can't agree with 115-112 tho!..

[The Gambler1981]

I can make a way better case for Berto, Juarez, and Diaz then I have heard anyone make for Froch.

No one making a case for Froch actually bring up what Froch did it is all about how Dirrell fought. The clean effective punching clearly favored one man no matter how they fought and no one is even dis*****g that.

I still will not call it a robbery because Dirrell is to blame because he did not go the extra mile to really announce his control of the fight but to me it was clear because Froch did nothing (in all the other fights that people scream robbery the guy atleast did something).

[Doctor_Tenma]

Berto edged Collazo and that could have gone either way. Froch didn't win more then 3 rounds.

[Throwingbombs]

Considering the Froch vs Dirrel fight wasn't a robbery and was a perfectly understandable decison I went for the other one. God some of you yanks are bitter, your boy got beat get over it, he didn't come to fight.

Some of you guys even think B-Hop beat Calzaghe! c'mon man! he just grabbed and held and tried to limit his beating as much as possable all night.

[Dynamite Kid]

Berto beat Collazo imo but you can at least make a case for Collazo, he was always landing shots in that fight, Froch wasn't landing ****.

[Syf]

I saw Froch-Dirrell 5 times...

Holy **** man... how did you have the intestinal fortitude for that

[#1Assassin]

i havent scored froch-dirrell myself yet. berto-collazo wasnt a robbery at all. very close fight that couldve gon eighter way, right choice in my opinion to give it to the defending champion. no matter who u have it for it was way too close to be called a robbery, ppl throw out that word like they dont know the meaning. a robbery is cearly winning a fight only to have the other guy get it. being in a extremely close fight and coming up short isnt being robbed. collazo wasnt robbed of the decison, he was robbed of a rematch that he more than deserved though.