WBC President REVEALS Pacquiao ranking was a MISTAKE!

[IronDanHamza]

Why isn't it.

Errol Spence going from being ranked #1 (allegedly) in the world to being totally dominated and stopped before the championship rounds, then falling off the map for two years is all truth.

So anyone labeling him a bogus hypjob is totally justified and needs no further justification

Right, so, going by that exact logic;

Was Hatton a bogus #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Barrera a bogus #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Joe Frazier bogus #1 when George Foreman beat him?

Was George Foreman a bogus #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

Was Micheal Spinks a bogus #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

Was Anontio Margarito a bogus #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

Was **** Tiger a bogus #1 LHW when Bob Foster beat him?

All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out, or as you eloquently put it “got their **** pushed in”

Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights?

Why would you think that when a fighter is ranked #1, then losing a fight now means they weren’t #1 at the time of the fight? I need to know how you’ve managed to land on that comically stupid point of view.

You could try answering the questions now instead of overtly avoiding them.

[djtmal]

Right, so, going by that exact logic;

Was Hatton a bogus #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Barrera a bogus #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Joe Frazier bogus #1 when George Foreman beat him?

Was George Foreman a bogus #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

Was Micheal Spinks a bogus #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

Was Anontio Margarito a bogus #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

Was **** Tiger a bogus #1 LHW when Bob Foster beat him?

All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out, or as you eloquently put it “got their **** pushed in”

Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights?

Why would you think that when a fighter is ranked #1, then losing a fight now means they weren’t #1 at the time of the fight? I need to know how you’ve managed to land on that comically stupid point of view.

You could try answering the questions now instead of overtly avoiding them.

I already told you my stance and that's it

Start a thread

[IronDanHamza]

I already told you my stance and that's it

Start a thread

Ok, you can’t answer because you’re a coward.

Run along then you bitch