WBC President REVEALS Pacquiao ranking was a MISTAKE!

[El_Mero]

How is that not directly what you're saying?

Why was Spence bogus? You said because he was shut out and stopped, right?

Errl is bogus cause he fought handpicked, his side of the street fighters. Pbc made him out to be the best then got his sh.it pushed in and made to look a fraud. Its no wonder pbc looked like a bunch of ducking fools when they blackballed Crawf.

[El_Mero]

That is quite literally what you're saying.

Hatton and Barrera both bogus for Pacquaio is what you're saying here, They both got shut out, dominated and stopped and didn't land a punch.

Uh ohhhhhhh.

They never made excuses to NOT fight Pac. Didn't hide behind the skirts of their manager either.

Errl made plenty of excuses AND his behind Gayman's skirt

[IronDanHamza]

They never made excuses to NOT fight Pac. Didn't hide behind the skirts of their manager either.

Errl made plenty of excuses AND his behind Gayman's skirt

Ok I’m confused how any of the above somehow magically changes the fact he was ranked #1 at WW?

[El_Mero]

Ok I’m confused how any of the above somehow magically changes the fact he was ranked #1 at WW?

Good question as Im confused and still not sure how he was ranked #1 by fighting handpicked, his side of the street fighters while continuously making excuses to not fight Crawf.....

Either way, all questions were answered and his chapter in boxing is over. If its not, he's gonna get another beating at 160 or 168

[IronDanHamza]

Good question as Im confused and still not sure how he was ranked #1 by fighting handpicked, his side of the street fighters while continuously making excuses to not fight Crawf.....

Either way, all questions were answered and his chapter in boxing is over. If its not, he's gonna get another beating at 160 or 168

You mean winning 3 of the 4 belts?

That’s probably why.

[Boxing 112]

If you read the WBC rules and regulations. There are about 40 pages. The 40th page the final point is, these rules and regulations can be amended by a vote from our board of governors. Basically "these are the rules BUT we can still do wtf we want and when we want". The board is just going to do what Suleiman decides

[El_Mero]

You mean winning 3 of the 4 belts?

That’s probably why.

And then he got his **** pushed in when he fought across the street and Errl found out he wasn't what he thought he was. Had he had the balls to fcuk around and find out earlier, instead of making multiple excuses, his fanboys would've realized who the REAL truth is.....

[IronDanHamza]

And then he got his **** pushed in when he fought across the street and Errl found out he wasn't what he thought he was. Had he had the balls to fcuk around and find out earlier, instead of making multiple excuses, his fanboys would've realized who the REAL truth is.....

Rightttttt so we’re back to square one then now aren’t we?

If that is the criteria and logic for someone being “bogus #1” then;

Was Hatton a bogus #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Barrera a bogus #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Joe Frazier bogus #1 when George Foreman beat him?

Was George Foreman a bogus #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

Was Micheal Spinks a bogus #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

Was Anontio Margarito a bogus #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

Was **** Tiger a bogus #1 LHW when Bob Foster beat him?

All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out, or as you eloquently put it “got their **** pushed in”

Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights?

Since when does losing in a fight in dominant fashion and getting stopped somehow mean their previous accomplishments that lead to their #1 ranking disappears?

Oh yeah, it doesn’t, because it’s a dumb, nonsensical argument.

[djtmal]

Rightttttt so we’re back to square one then now aren’t we?

If that is the criteria and logic for someone being “bogus #1” then;

Was Hatton a bogus #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Barrera a bogus #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

Was Joe Frazier bogus #1 when George Foreman beat him?

Was George Foreman a bogus #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

Was Micheal Spinks a bogus #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

Was Anontio Margarito a bogus #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

Was **** Tiger a bogus #1 LHW when Bob Foster beat him?

All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out, or as you eloquently put it “got their **** pushed in”

Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights?

.

Who cares Errol Spence was hypejob personified

Errol The False Spence

[IronDanHamza]

Who cares Errol Spence was hypejob personified

Errol The False Spence

So by the same logic, all the others fighters mentioned are also hype jobs then, right?