Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WBC President REVEALS Pacquiao ranking was a MISTAKE!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by djtmal View Post

    No Spence didn't just lose. He got the brakes beat off him and was out of there before the championship rounds.

    Bogus #1 ww
    Ok, so going by that logic if Spence was a "bogus" #1 WW...

    Was Hatton a bogus #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

    Was Barrera a bogus #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

    Was Joe Frazier bogus #1 when George Foreman beat him?

    Was George Foreman a bogus #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

    Was Micheal Spinks a bogus #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

    Was Anontio Margarito a bogus #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

    Was **** Tiger a bogus #1 LHW when Bob Foster beat him?

    All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights?​

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by djtmal View Post

      Right same way they had Spence #1 ww in the world but when you watch the fights it's bogus
      How much did Pacquiao pay the WBC for this phony ranking?

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

        Ok, so going by that logic if Spence was a "bogus" #1 WW...

        Was Hatton a bogus #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

        Was Barrera a bogus #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

        Was Joe Frazier bogus #1 when George Foreman beat him?

        Was George Foreman a bogus #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

        Was Micheal Spinks a bogus #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

        Was Anontio Margarito a bogus #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

        Was **** Tiger a bogus #1 LHW when Bob Foster beat him?

        All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights?​
        Errol Spence was bogus

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

          How much did Pacquiao pay the WBC for this phony ranking?
          Ask him

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by djtmal View Post

            Ask him
            This is why he goes broke.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

              This is why he goes broke.
              Oh so now you the man's accountant

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                How much did Pacquiao pay the WBC for this phony ranking?
                But, Manny is broke and that's why he's fighting again. Right...

                Comment


                • #68
                  when you are the draw and will bring in lots of money, you can do as you wish. Half these WW cant even draw a fly.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                    Ranking someone 5th that just returned from retirement isn’t a mistake.

                    It’s corrupt.
                    Not exactly the same but all the organisations will make exceptions when it suits them. Ring have Fury ranked at number 1. The last time he claimed retirement within days Ring said belt was now vacant real quick and removed him from rankings, and put it on the line for AJ Usyk. Now it's been nearly half a year since he claimed retirement again, but this time Ring still want to keep him ranked top every month. Although we knew previous one was a fake retirement and this one likely is too, the previous one was an even clearer case of fake retirement since he never dropped the wbc that didn't stop them making ring vacant when it suited them to put it on the line for AJ Usyk
                    The Big Dunn The Big Dunn likes this.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                      Errol Spence was bogus
                      Ok, so going by that logic if Spence was a "bogus" #1 WW...

                      Was Hatton a bogus #1 at 140 when Pacquaio beat him?

                      Was Barrera a bogus #1 at 126 when Pacquaio beat him?

                      Was Joe Frazier bogus #1 when George Foreman beat him?

                      Was George Foreman a bogus #1 when Muhammad Ali beat him?

                      Was Micheal Spinks a bogus #1 when Mike Tyson beat him?

                      Was Anontio Margarito a bogus #1 when Shane Mosley beat him?

                      Was **** Tiger a bogus #1 LHW when Bob Foster beat him?

                      All were ranked #1, and none of the above won a round all of the above were knocked out. Does that somehow mean they weren't ranked #1 going into those fights?​​

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP