Just rewatched the fight? - post scorecards here

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 120
    Lords of BoxingScene
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 6264
    • 416
    • 799
    • 13,757

    #111
    R1 Froch
    R2 Froch
    R3 Froch
    R4 Froch
    R5 Froch
    R6 Froch
    R7 Froch
    R8 Froch
    R9 Froch
    R10 Froch
    R11 Froch
    R12 Froch

    completely one-sided. i even scored it 122 and gave him 2 extra points for coolness

    Comment

    • Sαntα
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 1589
      • 105
      • 75
      • 2,551

      #112
      If running away won you fight, Morrade Hakkar would be world champion.

      Comment

      • Ryn0
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2007
        • 11139
        • 310
        • 269
        • 20,767

        #113
        Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
        Froch didn't win a round untill the 7th. He wen't on to win the 8th round, and from there on I felt sorry and may have given him some rounds. Won 3 rounds, may have given him a round I shouldn't have. Like I said, he won no more then 4 rounds and landed no more then 3-4 solid shots. You can't win a fight if you don't land.
        I gave him only 3 rounds, IMO he won the 5th landed a good uppercut.

        Then won the 7th and 8th.

        Thats it.

        Comment

        • Ryn0
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 11139
          • 310
          • 269
          • 20,767

          #114
          Originally posted by RiΖO
          If running away won you fight, Morrade Hakkar would be world champion.
          but landing nothing secures you a victory right?

          oh wait, he did land rabbit punches.

          Comment

          • Special K
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 401
            • 17
            • 0
            • 6,556

            #115
            Originally posted by Ryn0
            but landing nothing secures you a victory right?

            oh wait, he did land rabbit punches.


            He did land on Dirrell, several times.

            And the only rabbit I saw was Dirrell, frightened little bunny.

            Comment

            • -Mustang-
              El Chapo Guzman
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 4224
              • 608
              • 520
              • 14,669

              #116
              I just watched the fight for the first time... Dirrell wasted a lot of time , whinning , complaining and i've never seen someone fall so many times without actually being knockeddown... that being said froch tried to run in and catch dirrell but andre's head movement was too much ... dirrell took 3 of the first 4 rounds , froch took almost all the middle rounds ... after the 8th i had froch winning 5-3 .... then dirrell stepped it up and even hurt froch in the 10th (even b/c of the 1pt deduction on dirrell) and hurt him in the 11th momentarily ... i also gave dirrell the 12th ... in a very close fight .....

              114-113 Andre Dirrell

              1 Dirrell
              2 Dirrell
              3 Froch
              4 Dirrell
              5 Froch
              6 Froch
              7 Froch
              8 Froch
              9 Dirrell
              10 EVEN
              11 Dirrell
              12 Dirrell
              Last edited by -Mustang-; 10-20-2009, 09:18 PM.

              Comment

              • DiegoFuego
                Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2005
                • 17338
                • 1,403
                • 586
                • 24,657

                #117
                Originally posted by timba1988
                R1 Froch
                R2 Dirrell
                R3 Froch
                R4 Dirrell
                R5 Froch
                R6 Froch

                R7 Dirrell
                R8 Froch
                R9 Froch
                R10 Even 9-9
                R11 Dirrell
                R12 Dirrell

                114 - 113 Froch. However a draw, or a one point win for Dirrell could be argued. I was in the arena with a good view last night, so I have experienced this fight from two perspectives.

                One thing that was apparent straight away, was Showtimes biased commentary. Froch landed quite a lot of jabs and inside punches that were ignored and not commented on. On top of this when Dirrell landed they were making a big deal out of soft jabs that barely knocked Froch's head back. Also Froch landed quite a few counter shots in exchanges that went unnoticed, while Dirrells were exuberantly praised.

                There were a lot of close and hard fought rounds in this fight, and a few could have gone either way, but I still don't think Dirrell warranted the decision. He spoiled all night because he didn't want to get caught up in the exchanges. Froch had Dirrell on the back foot for 10 out of 12 rounds, and landed enough of his own punches, and worked enough on the inside to win the fight. I don't see Froch's win as a controversial decision. Two of the judges score cards were definitely a little wide, but the correct fighter won.
                No f.u.c.k.i.n.g way

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 521
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #118
                  All I have to say is that was not really a close fight, Al Bernstein basically said you could not give Froch seven rounds because he said 115 was to wide a margin that is seven rounds, I personally do not see how you could give four rounds to Froch.

                  If it was a close fight I could accept the subjectivity of judging but it was by no means a close fight, between doing nothing and doing something doing something always wins even if you do not like the style.

                  Comment

                  • Shadows
                    All-Time Great
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 8293
                    • 192
                    • 250
                    • 15,434

                    #119
                    Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                    All I have to say is that was not really a close fight, Al Bernstein basically said you could not give Froch seven rounds because he said 115 was to wide a margin that is seven rounds, I personally do not see how you could give four rounds to Froch.

                    If it was a close fight I could accept the subjectivity of judging but it was by no means a close fight, between doing nothing and doing something doing something always wins even if you do not like the style.
                    That's pretty much the way I saw it.

                    Dirrell could have been more aggressive, but still, I thought he won clearly.

                    Comment

                    • Mighty_Windir
                      Metal Elitist
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2009
                      • 7101
                      • 473
                      • 949
                      • 977,555

                      #120
                      rd 1 direll
                      rd2 direll
                      rd3 direll
                      rd4 froch
                      rd5 direll
                      rd6 direll
                      rd7 froch
                      rd8 froch
                      rd9 direll
                      rd10 even
                      rd11 direll
                      rd12 direll

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP