Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?

[TheProudLunatic]

Another poll should be -
"Who had an easier run in their respective divs, WW Pac or MW GGG ?"

So very close

[IronDanHamza]

Anyways

Manny beat the best ww bar none when he beat Thurman

Lying Dan can't let it go because Boxrec is his god

Oh look, you can't You lying fat cunt.

Show where I have cited Boxrec once in this thread. Back up your word.

[IronDanHamza]

He was stripped. He didn't lose it in the ring

So he wasn't unified Champion then. So don't lie and say that he was, when he wasn't.

He didn't have a ranked win in 28 months he's lucky he had any belt at all.

[djtmal]

So he wasn't unified Champion then. So don't lie and say that he was, when he wasn't.

He didn't have a ranked win in 28 months he's lucky he had any belt at all.

and he still was the guy at ww

Manny fought the best guy out of those 3.

If he fought Crawford the fight would have lost money

According to his former promotor:

Bob Arum On Terence Crawford: “We’ve Lost Money On Every Fight”

[TheProudLunatic]

If he fought Crawford the fight would have lost money

As if Boss Arum would have put Pac at risk.
Bud was a WW since 2015
Was promoted by Bob as well as Pac.
Do you think for a split second Bob would throw his only cash cow into a meatgrinder ?!?!?

[djtmal]

As if Boss Arum would have put Pac at risk.
Bud was a WW since 2015
Was promoted by Bob as well as Pac.
Do you think for a split second Bob would throw his only cash cow into a meatgrinder ?!?!?

Lol. Crawford still hasn't beat anyone as accomplished as Manny and he's pushing 40.

Can't even carry a card on his own unless it's in his hometown why you think he is praying Canelo will come through

Manny would have beat Crawford, and still wind up in the red when the receipts are tallied

[IronDanHamza]

and he still was the guy at ww

Manny fought the best guy out of those 3.

If he fought Crawford the fight would have lost money

According to his former promotor:

Bob Arum On Terence Crawford: “We’ve Lost Money On Every Fight”

Didn't you say Floyd wasn't the P4P #1 anymore because he was off 2 years? Then now you've realised it implodes your own retarded point

He wasn't "the guy" he was #3. He wasn't unified champion at that time. So those are two lies you've just told. See, when I call you a liar, I can cite the lies. You've yet to cite what I've supposedly lied about.

0 ranked wins in 28 months, NOT the #1 WW. Objective fact.

Sorry fatboy, these are facts. You'll have to just get over it.

[djtmal]

He wasn't "the guy" he was #3. He wasn't unified champion at that time. So those are two lies you've just told. See, when I call you a liar, I can cite the lies. You've yet to cite what I've supposedly lied about

0 ranked wins in 28 months, NOT the #1 WW. Objective fact.

.

Follow along properly you weirdo I said Thurman was the two belt champ, stripped of one but never lost it in the ring

Crawford or Spence never beat Thurman for the top spot, so Thurman was the guy still, and Manny beat him.

Didn't make sense for Manny to fight Crawford because he wasn't really the guy, didn't bring anything to the table. Just face it. Floyd boys adopted Crawford, but at ww he wasn't really the guy until Manny retired and Spence self imploded

[IronDanHamza]

Follow along properly you weirdo I said Thurman was the two belt champ, stripped of one but never lost it in the ring

Right so he WASN'T unified champion then in 2019, was he? So don't lie and say that he was. Because, he wasn't.

Also by that logic then Floyd was still P4P #1 in 2009 when he came back then since he "didn't lose it in the ring"? But that's the point you made to defend your point when it does the opposite Thick as a plank of wood, aren't you?

Crawford or Spence never beat Thurman for the top spot, so Thurman was the guy still, and Manny beat him.

No he just did nothing for 28 months thus got stripped. He was lucky they let him keep the one belt he had and let him stay ranked.

Which we know was #3 I.e not #1 that you've tried to lie and say that he was.

Didn't make sense for Manny to fight Crawford because he wasn't really the guy, didn't bring anything to the table. Just face it. Floyd boys adopted Crawford, but at ww he wasn't really the guy until Manny retired and Spence imploded

Oh right yeah it "didn't make sense" for Pacquaio to fight Crawford who was P4P #2 at the time and WW #2 at the time but it did make sense to fight Thurman who hadn't beaten a ranked fighter in 28 months, was #3 at WW and wasn't even in the P4P list (and never has been)

Are you listening to yourself you fat waste of life? Your posts somehow get dumber each time. It's quite an impressive level of idiocy.

[djtmal]

.

0 ranked wins in 28 months, NOT the #1 .

On paper maybe or in your fantasy rankings but the truth is he was the guy to beat