froch was terrible tonight its not like dirrell was that great froch just didnt do ****....you could give him 4 rounds out of kindness.....i hate when judges take crowd noise into factor, most of frochs punches were not hitting clean and when they did people thought dirrell was gonna go...im not suprised at the decision tho...
Poll: Who Won The Fight Dirrell Or Froch?
Collapse
-
-
i'm watchin the fight again right now and it's round 8 and at this point the only clear round for dirrell is round 5 and maybe round 7 but i also think that that was a close roundComment
-
Comment
-
-
or go get that lazy eye fixed. maybe cataracts are the problem.Comment
-
That's bull****, he won the fight. He landed cleaner punches. He didn't get hit as much. The point taken away was bull**** even if Dirrell cried about it.Good post, I agree.
Dirrell showed himself to be the more talented boxer, but for most of the fight he just ran. Whenever Froch landed, Dirrell replied by holding.
That's not the way to win a world title. If he would have engaged Froch, and boxed without running so much, he would have deserved it. But his negative approach tonight didn't win over the judges.Comment
-
-
I hate when people say oh this guy only won because the other guy stopped doing whatever or the other guy just didn't do anything... The reason why he didn't do anything was because his best attributes were neutralized by the actions of the other fighter. I still have to watch the fight but from the comments I gather that dirrel used his foot speed and hand speed by continuously moving so froch couldn't sit on his punches and throw quality punches and countering him when he tried to rush in for a punch. Am I close?froch was terrible tonight its not like dirrell was that great froch just didnt do ****....you could give him 4 rounds out of kindness.....i hate when judges take crowd noise into factor, most of frochs punches were not hitting clean and when they did people thought dirrell was gonna go...im not suprised at the decision tho...Comment
Comment