Poll: Who Won The Fight Dirrell Or Froch?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wizard king
    Banned
    • May 2009
    • 1846
    • 113
    • 79
    • 2,052

    #91
    **** europe,dirrell won this fight i dont give a dam how much dirrell ran he landed the cleaner punches, man this **** nuts. man its funny how the mexican judges lean more to brawlers and pressure fighters yet he gave it to dirrel, the only judge with any ****ing sense.
    Last edited by wizard king; 10-18-2009, 12:27 AM.

    Comment

    • Frank Martin
      The Transporter
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 2086
      • 100
      • 60
      • 8,551

      #92
      I bet on Froch. But I feel sorry for Direll. He could have won the fight.

      Comment

      • Nautilus
        ...
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2004
        • 6083
        • 402
        • 761
        • 13,468

        #93
        Originally posted by Briandl
        Poll: Who Won The Fight Dirrell Or Froch?

        I think Dirrell won it.

        Initial rounds were hard to score, with a lot of running and little punching.

        Later rounds were easy to score, and I think Dirrell won several more of them.

        Comment

        • Walterson
          Banned
          • Aug 2009
          • 1987
          • 140
          • 26
          • 2,180

          #94
          I'm British and Dirrell blatantly won that fight.

          It was disgraceful.

          How can people say Froch won, it was just like Khan vs that Koltenik guy but better!

          If you're going to win for not hitting than that's a robbery.

          Bloody disgrace and the commentary was disgusting. It was only after round 5 that the commentators realised that Dirrell was schooling Froch.

          Lost respect for Steve Bunce too.

          And I'm hating this 'running' word. If you know you have a 'suspect' chin, why trade? Dirrell did what he had to do against someone with power, if he didn't he would have ended up like Taylor.

          Really pissed off!

          Comment

          • !! Shawn
            !! Shown
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 9810
            • 670
            • 724
            • 31,455

            #95
            Originally posted by gqjohnb
            I hate when people say oh this guy only won because the other guy stopped doing whatever or the other guy just didn't do anything... The reason why he didn't do anything was because his best attributes were neutralized by the actions of the other fighter. I still have to watch the fight but from the comments I gather that dirrel used his foot speed and hand speed by continuously moving so froch couldn't sit on his punches and throw quality punches and countering him when he tried to rush in for a punch. Am I close?
            Yes, Dirrell used classic amateur style lateral movement to prevent Froch from setting his feet the whole fight. First half of the fight he was throwing straight left hands to the body, while peppering Froch with the jab, and keeping Froch in check with gorgeous feints.

            Middle part of the fight Froch started fouling like it was his job, was getting to Dirrells head a bit, but as soon as the took a point from Dirrell, he snapped back to reality and started to put a real beatdown on Froch. He had Froch hurt atleast twice, and buzzed a 3rd time in the last half of the fight, all while not getting hit at all.

            Id honestly be surprised if Froch landed 12% of his punches tonight.

            Comment

            • letsgobrady
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 6274
              • 126
              • 11
              • 12,670

              #96
              Originally posted by !! Shawn
              You should seriously stop watching boxing then.
              you should stop watchin boxin you are all bias, i'm from the usa and i am bein as unbias as possible i am watchin the fight right now and dirrell clearly won rounds 5 and 11 and froch clearly won round 8 every other round are toss up rounds and could of went to either fighter

              Comment

              • !! Shawn
                !! Shown
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 9810
                • 670
                • 724
                • 31,455

                #97
                Originally posted by Nautilus
                I think Dirrell won it.

                Initial rounds were hard to score, with a lot of running and little punching.

                Later rounds were easy to score, and I think Dirrell won several more of them.
                Early rounds were the easiest to score, Dirrell absolutely mind ****ed Froch with feints, made Froch scared to throw a punch.

                Comment

                • wizard king
                  Banned
                  • May 2009
                  • 1846
                  • 113
                  • 79
                  • 2,052

                  #98
                  what is really sad about this whole fight is when you got dirrell coner telling him you got to knock him out cause you aint getting a decision here. even knowing that they won the fight they knew they were going to lose, that **** aint right

                  Comment

                  • !! Shawn
                    !! Shown
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 9810
                    • 670
                    • 724
                    • 31,455

                    #99
                    Originally posted by letsgobrady
                    you should stop watchin boxin you are all bias, i'm from the usa and i am bein as unbias as possible i am watchin the fight right now and dirrell clearly won rounds 5 and 11 and froch clearly won round 8 every other round are toss up rounds and could of went to either fighter
                    Unbias doesn't mean give the other fighter credit for **** he didn't do.

                    Comment

                    • !! Shawn
                      !! Shown
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 9810
                      • 670
                      • 724
                      • 31,455

                      #100
                      Originally posted by wizard king
                      what is really sad about this whole fight is when you got dirrell coner telling him you got to knock him out cause you aint getting a decision here. even knowing that they won the fight they knew they were going to lose, that **** aint right
                      I knew he wasn't getting the decision too. After the display of reffing, it really reflects on the process they use to pick officials. So if the ref was in the tank, its only fair to assume the judges were too.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP