Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poll: Who Won The Fight Dirrell Or Froch?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    froch was terrible tonight its not like dirrell was that great froch just didnt do ****....you could give him 4 rounds out of kindness.....i hate when judges take crowd noise into factor, most of frochs punches were not hitting clean and when they did people thought dirrell was gonna go...im not suprised at the decision tho...

    Comment


    • #82
      i'm watchin the fight again right now and it's round 8 and at this point the only clear round for dirrell is round 5 and maybe round 7 but i also think that that was a close round

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by letsgobrady View Post
        i'm watchin the fight again right now and it's round 8 and at this point the only clear round for dirrell is round 5 and maybe round 7 but i also think that that was a close round
        You should seriously stop watching boxing then.

        Comment


        • #84
          I still have to watch the fight but I saw this coming...

          Comment


          • #85
            Andre Dirrell won this fight going away. Froch won 4 rounds and got awarded a point by an imcompetent judge. That was horrendous.

            He landed clean punches all fight. I can't believe so many people had it for Dirrell.

            Comment


            • #86
              I had it 116-111 Dirrell.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by letsgobrady View Post
                i'm watchin the fight again right now and it's round 8 and at this point the only clear round for dirrell is round 5 and maybe round 7 but i also think that that was a close round
                Originally posted by !! Shawn View Post
                You should seriously stop watching boxing then.
                or go get that lazy eye fixed. maybe cataracts are the problem.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Carnivore View Post
                  Good post, I agree.

                  Dirrell showed himself to be the more talented boxer, but for most of the fight he just ran. Whenever Froch landed, Dirrell replied by holding.

                  That's not the way to win a world title. If he would have engaged Froch, and boxed without running so much, he would have deserved it. But his negative approach tonight didn't win over the judges.
                  That's bull****, he won the fight. He landed cleaner punches. He didn't get hit as much. The point taken away was bull**** even if Dirrell cried about it.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    froch 115-114

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by billionaire View Post
                      froch was terrible tonight its not like dirrell was that great froch just didnt do ****....you could give him 4 rounds out of kindness.....i hate when judges take crowd noise into factor, most of frochs punches were not hitting clean and when they did people thought dirrell was gonna go...im not suprised at the decision tho...
                      I hate when people say oh this guy only won because the other guy stopped doing whatever or the other guy just didn't do anything... The reason why he didn't do anything was because his best attributes were neutralized by the actions of the other fighter. I still have to watch the fight but from the comments I gather that dirrel used his foot speed and hand speed by continuously moving so froch couldn't sit on his punches and throw quality punches and countering him when he tried to rush in for a punch. Am I close?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP