Comments Thread For: Bivol-Beterbiev remains a Russian classic in need of translation and a third act

[MulaKO]

Thanks for continuing to prove your rétardation to this thread/forum, son.

SON your like a little biatching puppy who keeps coming back for more
Rabbit punches anymore excuses dumbass
We all know you’re a

[Boro]

SON your like a little biatching puppy who keeps coming back for more
Rabbit punches anymore excuses dumbass
We all know you’re a

Excuses for what?! now you're just away with the faeries.

If you're going to engage in a conversation at least be logical, I have no reasons to be making excuses!? considering there is literally nothing to be excused.

And again with the "BS" name one thing I've "BS" about and I'll be impressed son.

[MulaKO]

Excuses for what?! now you're just away with the faeries.

If you're going to engage in a conversation at least be logical, I have no reasons to be making excuses!? considering there is literally nothing to be excused.

And again with the "BS" name one thing I've "BS" about and I'll be impressed son.

Here boy
That’s a good lil’biatch

[Boro]

Here boy
That’s a good lil’biatch

You accuse of me BSing can't back it up, accuse me of makings excuses for something/someone can't back that up either.

Like I said previously you're constantly just proving how rétarded you are.

BTW you can call me w/e you like son, inferior people aren't going to offend me.

[MulaKO]

You accuse of me BSing can't back it up, accuse me of makings excuses for something/someone can't back that up either.

Like I said previously you're constantly just proving how rétarded you are.

BTW you can call me w/e you like son, inferior people aren't going to offend me.

Your back puppy

[Boro]

Your back puppy

Who'd guess someone sees a notification and responds, shocker

At this point I'm bored of you, I thought perhaps you'd eventually somehow back up calling me a bullshítter from the moment you engaged with me.

Or calling me "mr compubox" and insinuating my apparent reliance on it despite everything I’ve said contradicting that.

Expecting a brave soul on the internet to engage in social norms is too much to ask, I guess.

But then again framing it like this might be too much of an abstract concept for you to fully grasp.

So in layman's terms in real life, if you accuse someone of something, evidence must substantiate the claim or you'll have to face the consequences.

[MulaKO]

Who'd guess someone sees a notification and responds, shocker

At this point I'm bored of you, I thought perhaps you'd eventually somehow back up calling me a bullshítter from the moment you engaged with me.

Or calling me "mr compubox" and insinuating my apparent reliance on it despite everything I’ve said contradicting that.

Expecting a brave soul on the internet to engage in social norms is too much to ask, I guess.

But then again framing it like this might be too much of an abstract concept for you to fully grasp.

So in layman's terms in real life, if you accuse someone of something, evidence must substantiate the claim or you'll have to face the consequences.

But but rabbit punches
Mr compubox you’re a
Live with it loser

[Damn Wicked]

VERY close fight.

Round by round I can see both fights being a draw or slightly in favour of one or the other fighter BUT Bivol took more of a beating in both fights. Boxing 's point system is really flawed as it doesn't really reward "fighting", as in "hurting" the opponent. Boxing isn't fencing and it shouldn't be about slowing the fight down and "not fighting". The guy who does the most damage should be rewarded. If you can avoid the heavier damage and cause more damage to your opponent, then you win the round. Rounds should be scored wider than just 10-9 or 10-8 or 10-7. If someone suffers a really hard knockdown and is badly hurt throughout the whole round, they should lose more points than just a 10-8 or 10-7 round. It should be more like a 10-6 or 10-5 round.

[SouthpawRight]

VERY close fight.

Round by round I can see both fights being a draw or slightly in favour of one or the other fighter BUT Bivol took more of a beating in both fights. Boxing 's point system is really flawed as it doesn't really reward "fighting", as in "hurting" the opponent. Boxing isn't fencing and it shouldn't be about slowing the fight down and "not fighting". The guy who does the most damage should be rewarded. If you can avoid the heavier damage and cause more damage to your opponent, then you win the round. Rounds should be scored wider than just 10-9 or 10-8 or 10-7. If someone suffers a really hard knockdown and is badly hurt throughout the whole round, they should lose more points than just a 10-8 or 10-7 round. It should be more like a 10-6 or 10-5 round.

we confirm who hurt who more in the trilogy later this year

I believe fight 2 was the start of Bivol’s prime and the end of Artur’s

Bivol has the better chin and Artur took many clean headshots from him. Wear & tear is on Artur

Imo fight 2 was the best Artur we’ll see in regards to fighting Bivol

I think Artur’s best work in the trilogy will occur during rounds 7 8 9

Bivol sweeps the first half and takes most of the championship rounds for a wide UD

[champion4ever]

One can make a case for both. Since officially they are evenly split. A rubber match is made to order.

However and in my judgement; Dmitry Bivol has already proven that he is hands down the better fighter both times the two have fought.

In fight one, Artur Beterbiev received a political gift decision based on his faith. That he did not earn in which Dmitry Bivol clearly won.