All These AI Asterisks Are A Pathetic Joke. Fix This Sh it. WTF

[ScottPowers]

I think the deeper similarities to Krishna are due to temporal proximity. The two myths were separated by around 1000 years or so. While Krishna's name has remained the same for thousands of years, what's slightly stranger about the Jesus myth, but rarely discussed, is that the name Jesus is only around 400 years old, because the letter J was invented in the year 1524. So if the character had been a real historical figure, he wouldn't even respond to the name "Jesus", since this name was only introduced in the King James bible less than 400 hundred years ago. Today's believers worship a main character who had a fairly recent name-change, as the name Jesus was popularized across the English-speaking world by a British king's bible rewrite.AI restrictions and limitations are becoming a complete joke. Every time we try to use AI for something useful, we run into unnecessary barriers. Companies claim they want AI to help, but then cripple it with ridiculous safeguards. If AI is supposed to revolutionize learning and work, why does it feel like we're constantly fighting against it? Just look at this comparison of AI-powered learning platforms: https://ddi-dev.com/blog/programming...ing-platforms/ ai should be a tool for progress, not a bureaucratic nightmare. Fix this nonsense!

Some of the similarities to the Krishna myth are pretty fascinating..

* Both Krishna and Jesus were from royal descent.
* Both were born with some form of divine intervention.
* As kids, Krishna and Jesus both hid from evil rulers who wanted to kill all new born males. Krishna hid from Prince Kansa. Jesus hid from King Herod.
* Both had to make a great escape, Krishna had to cross a river (as did Moses), Jesus had to flee to Egypt.
* Again similar to Moses, when Krishna crossed the river, the waters parted to allow easy passage. In the later Moses story, the seas parted for easy passage.. (cross-references within the religions where selective sections from the earlier Krishna myth are later modified and shared between the Moses and Jesus characters in the Bible)
* Both Jesus and Krishna were called "lord" and "savior" in their lifetime.
* Both experienced transfiguration, and their bodies shone light.
* Both performed miracles and healing.
* Krishna cured a hunchback woman, Jesus cured lepers.
* Both brought people back to life.
* Both had to fight demons.
* Both have very similar names, Krishna - Christ. The word Krishna may have roots in the Sanskrit word Krsta, which means Supreme Being or Pure.
* Both died by sharp weapons near wood. Krishna died near a tree, by an arrow to the heel (his only weak spot, like the Achilles story), Jesus died by crucifixion on a wooden cross.
* etc..

agree with you

[Roadblock]

Admin robots are taking over let's face it.

Yes but they are referencing a txt file of words that a person must have put together, its ridiculous what they censor in here.

[TheProudLunatic]

Please, don't tempt the AI
It loves to give out "inappropriate" bans

[FlatLine]

You’re reading too much into it, and unnecessarily confusing the matter. The name Jesus is synonymous with Yeshua. It’s like anglicizing a name like Jose into Joseph, or Pietro into Peter. The writers of the gospels were writing in Greek, therefore they changed the Lord’s name to fit the language they were communicating in. The scribes translating from Greek to English made similar adjustments to suit their readers. None of it is here nor there to me. As I said earlier, I once subscribed to your general way of thinking; but even then, I would’ve drawn the same observations I just made. I’d really rather just drop the discussion here. No point.

Yep people made adjustments to suit their readers. Just like they made adjustments from the earlier Krishna stories to suit their readers, which is essentially how Christianity materialized. It reminds me sometimes of when older movies get Hollywood remakes. Or foreign movies get an English language remake where the story might be largely different on the surface, but the core themes remain very similar. It's just surprising sometimes that people cling on to these myths even in today's modern world. Religions were invented so easily and so often by humans that we've amassed thousands of gods by now. "Cargo Cults" is another fascinating insight into how easily religions come about. Alright bro, i can respect if you prefer to leave the discussion, fair enough.

[CubanGuyNYC]

It's widely known that Iesous was the Greek translation (not Jesus). And that was the first case of a drastic name change of the character. What's not widely known though is that Iesous was then changed to Jesus after the letter J had been invented only 400 years ago. King James then spread this new name for the mythical character in his new Anglicized version of the bible. So today we have people referring to "Jesus", while not realizing that the name was only invented a few hundred years ago.

Quick hypothetical: if we imagine there was a real Yeshua who existed thousands of years ago, and someone today was able to travel back to his time, he wouldn't even respond to the name Jesus. He'd have no idea who Jesus is. It's a little too far removed from the original name of the character.

You’re reading too much into it, and unnecessarily confusing the matter. The name Jesus is synonymous with Yeshua. It’s like anglicizing a name like Jose into Joseph, or Pietro into Peter. The writers of the gospels were writing in Greek, therefore they changed the Lord’s name to fit the language they were communicating in. The scribes translating from Greek to English made similar adjustments to suit their readers. None of it is here nor there to me. As I said earlier, I once subscribed to your general way of thinking; but even then, I would’ve drawn the same observations I just made. I’d really rather just drop the discussion here. No point.

[FlatLine]

I would expect someone like yourself to know that the name Jesus is a Greek translation (the original gospels were written in Greek) of the Lord’s Hebrew name — Yeshua.

It's widely known that Iesous was the Greek translation (not Jesus). And that was the first case of a drastic name change of the character. What's not widely known though is that Iesous was then changed to Jesus after the letter J had been invented only 400 years ago. King James then spread this new name for the mythical character in his new Anglicized version of the bible. So today we have people referring to "Jesus", while not realizing that the name was only invented a few hundred years ago.

Quick hypothetical: if we imagine there was a real Yeshua who existed thousands of years ago, and someone today was able to travel back to his time, he wouldn't even respond to the name Jesus. He'd have no idea who Jesus is. It's a little too far removed from the original name of the character.

[CubanGuyNYC]

I think the deeper similarities to Krishna are due to temporal proximity. The two myths were separated by around 1000 years or so. While Krishna's name has remained the same for thousands of years, what's slightly stranger about the Jesus myth, but rarely discussed, is that the name Jesus is only around 400 years old, because the letter J was invented in the year 1524. So if the character had been a real historical figure, he wouldn't even respond to the name "Jesus", since this name was only introduced in the King James bible less than 400 hundred years ago. Today's believers worship a main character who had a fairly recent name-change, as the name Jesus was popularized across the English-speaking world by a British king's bible rewrite.

Some of the similarities to the Krishna myth are pretty fascinating..

* Both Krishna and Jesus were from royal descent.
* Both were born with some form of divine intervention.
* As kids, Krishna and Jesus both hid from evil rulers who wanted to kill all new born males. Krishna hid from Prince Kansa. Jesus hid from King Herod.
* Both had to make a great escape, Krishna had to cross a river (as did Moses), Jesus had to flee to Egypt.
* Again similar to Moses, when Krishna crossed the river, the waters parted to allow easy passage. In the later Moses story, the seas parted for easy passage.. (cross-references within the religions where selective sections from the earlier Krishna myth are later modified and shared between the Moses and Jesus characters in the Bible)
* Both Jesus and Krishna were called "lord" and "savior" in their lifetime.
* Both experienced transfiguration, and their bodies shone light.
* Both performed miracles and healing.
* Krishna cured a hunchback woman, Jesus cured lepers.
* Both brought people back to life.
* Both had to fight demons.
* Both have very similar names, Krishna - Christ. The word Krishna may have roots in the Sanskrit word Krsta, which means Supreme Being or Pure.
* Both died by sharp weapons near wood. Krishna died near a tree, by an arrow to the heel (his only weak spot, like the Achilles story), Jesus died by crucifixion on a wooden cross.
* etc..

I would expect someone like yourself to know that the name Jesus is a Greek translation (the original gospels were written in Greek) of the Lord’s Hebrew name — Yeshua.

[FlatLine]

â

Like the source of all the sources? Jesus has a lot of overlap with quite a few ancient characters, especially Greek ones.

There were quite a few Messiahs around the time frame for Jesus's life. Most of which dealt in the same basics and of course those basics can be traced back to the earliest religions but I've never heard anyone just say - This one is the source for them all.

If you take yourself back to that timeframe, about 300 years before Theodosius and the Christianization of Rome; Roman tolerance of other religions was at an all time high and while you might see, say in a biopic, others preaching as Jesus did, on the street to the masses who would stop for them, I don't often see that economy explained.

It was common for regular people to not believe they knew the proper ways to commune with gods. Including the ***s and ***ish God. Likewise, it was common for men who were trained in ritual to conduct rituals for hire. This is what's important to understand, that freelance ritual leader is not necessarily in any way ordained by anything. His credentials are his ability to conduct the ritual not preach or teach you anything. The preaching is their marketing. They stand outside and preach what they know of their religion hoping to catch the ear of someone who has recently lost a loved one or wants to get married or ask forgiveness, or predict the future, you know ... bunch of God and gods bull.

And so, by the time Jesus is there to preach, if we assume he is at all, one may not need to know who Krishna is per se, but they will know of the 12 olympians, 12 zodiacs, 12 tribes, etc. leaving you with a whole heaps of "messiah" who more or less preach the same thing.

This is also a time when mankind easily accepts the idea a living and dying human might be the son of a god. It wouldn't be but 500 years prior people believed this so strongly just being named after a god afforded you special treament.

I think the deeper similarities to Krishna are due to temporal proximity. The two myths were separated by around 1000 years or so. While Krishna's name has remained the same for thousands of years, what's slightly stranger about the Jesus myth, but rarely discussed, is that the name Jesus is only around 400 years old, because the letter J was invented in the year 1524. So if the character had been a real historical figure, he wouldn't even respond to the name "Jesus", since this name was only introduced in the King James bible less than 400 hundred years ago. Today's believers worship a main character who had a fairly recent name-change, as the name Jesus was popularized across the English-speaking world by a British king's bible rewrite.

Some of the similarities to the Krishna myth are pretty fascinating..

* Both Krishna and Jesus were from royal descent.
* Both were born with some form of divine intervention.
* As kids, Krishna and Jesus both hid from evil rulers who wanted to kill all new born males. Krishna hid from Prince Kansa. Jesus hid from King Herod.
* Both had to make a great escape, Krishna had to cross a river (as did Moses), Jesus had to flee to Egypt.
* Again similar to Moses, when Krishna crossed the river, the waters parted to allow easy passage. In the later Moses story, the seas parted for easy passage.. (cross-references within the religions where selective sections from the earlier Krishna myth are later modified and shared between the Moses and Jesus characters in the Bible)
* Both Jesus and Krishna were called "lord" and "savior" in their lifetime.
* Both experienced transfiguration, and their bodies shone light.
* Both performed miracles and healing.
* Krishna cured a hunchback woman, Jesus cured lepers.
* Both brought people back to life.
* Both had to fight demons.
* Both have very similar names, Krishna - Christ. The word Krishna may have roots in the Sanskrit word Krsta, which means Supreme Being or Pure.
* Both died by sharp weapons near wood. Krishna died near a tree, by an arrow to the heel (his only weak spot, like the Achilles story), Jesus died by crucifixion on a wooden cross.
* etc..

[TintaBoricua]

lmao..we gonna have to get him one of these for the andre the giant sausage fingers he sportin'


maxresdefault.jpg

lmfao

[Marchegiano]

Make BoxingScene Great Again