Granted, it's only suppose to be unofficial and they're still going by the official judge scorecards, but it brings up an interesting idea. How accurate is AI in scoring? If it became a "thing" in the future to try and remove human judges, could it be trusted that it wasn't manipulated in some way to favor one fighter over the other? I suppose that wouldn't be much different than human judges...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AI to Judge Tyson-Usyk
Collapse
-
Originally posted by elfag View Postidk what do you think of the computer scoring for Ali-Marciano
Originally posted by Joseph View PostIt can't be any worse than the knuckleheads scoring fights these days.
Comment
-
AI judging could solve so many problems with bias humans...
But the problem is that it'll be based on rules. How much is a jab worth? How much is a body shot worth?
Once people work out the scoring, they could end up fighting tactically to accrue points.
Like the old Amateur system with pitty pat punches to score.
Human judging is poor, but ultimately judging IS subjective and not rules based.
Having said that, something needs to change. Maybe a mixture of the two, two human, two AI.
Comment
-
Honestly it doesn't matter. If they aren't even willing to hold human judges accountable for bad scorecards, or use instant replay and have the ability to overturn bad ref decisions, etc, they will certainly use AI scoring to fix fights.
Comment
Comment